GOGL ranks 123rd and GRAG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GOGL vs GRAG
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.55pt a year
0.20%0.75%
GRAG 2.0×the volume
24.4K48.8K
GOGL vs GRAG Performance
−42.8%−20.9%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- GRAG 0.75%
- GOGL $4M
- GRAG $3M
- GOGL 1
- GRAG 4
- GOGL 24.4K sh
- GRAG 48.8K sh, better
- GOGL $16.10
- GRAG $4.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOGL | GRAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A70 |
| Mission | B67 | |
| Risk | B68Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C48Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D34 | C44Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GOGL and GRAG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOGLC
GRAGC
In short
GRAG Two times Grab Holdings' daily move, in an ETF you can hold in a plain brokerage account. It costs 0.75%, under the usual toll for single-stock leverage, and the exposure resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon instrument.
Stated mandate
GRAG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% (2x) of Grab Holdings Limited stock's daily performance before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOGL vs GRAG Holdings
How GOGL and GRAG differ
0.0%
About this figure: GOGL gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
GRAG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GOGL and GRAG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GOGLMore in GRAG | Gap | GOGL | GRAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- GOGL199.3%
- GRAG208.1%
- GOGL0
- GRAG1
Asset class
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- GRAG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in GOGL0
- In both0
- Only in GRAG1
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Only in GRAG
1 security, 8.1% of GRAG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.12%
Weight gaps
GOGL and GRAG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOGL vs GRAG Cost
Overpaying GRAG vs GOGL
$10,327
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
GRAG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOGL | GRAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,336 | $971 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $5,078 | $3,657 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $14,482 | $10,327 |
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- 0.75%GRAG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
GRAG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
GOGL vs GRAG Dividends
- GOGL None
- GRAG None
Distribution history
GOGL vs GRAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- GOGL −3.37GRAG 1.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.