PANG ranks 3rd and GRAG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GRAG vs PANG
GRAG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
GRAG 1.1×the volume
48.8K43.3K
GRAG vs PANG Performance
−62.1%+105.0%
- GRAG 0.75%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- GRAG $3M
- PANG $8M
- GRAG
- PANG +48.4%
- GRAG 4
- PANG 4
- GRAG 48.8K sh, better
- PANG 43.3K sh
- GRAG $4.87
- PANG $28.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GRAG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | B67 | A94Higher |
| Risk | C48 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C44 | B57Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GRAG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GRAGC
PANGA
In short
GRAG Two times Grab Holdings' daily move, in an ETF you can hold in a plain brokerage account. It costs 0.75%, under the usual toll for single-stock leverage, and the exposure resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon instrument.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
GRAG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% (2x) of Grab Holdings Limited stock's daily performance before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GRAG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GRAG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs GRAG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GRAG 0.75%
$14,482
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GRAG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%GRAG, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GRAG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
GRAG vs PANG Dividends
- GRAG None
- PANG
- GRAG
- PANG $1.30
- GRAG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- GRAG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- GRAG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
GRAG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GRAG PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GRAG PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- GRAG PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GRAG 1.40PANG 3.57
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.