LULG ranks 21st and GOGL 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GOGL vs LULG
GOGL −0.55pt a year
0.20%0.75%
LULG 19.3×the volume
24.7K477K
GOGL vs LULG Performance
−37.7%−33.0%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- LULG 0.75%
- GOGL $4M
- LULG $6M
- GOGL
- LULG −68.6%
- GOGL 1
- LULG 4
- GOGL 24.7K sh
- LULG 477K sh, better
- GOGL $15.61
- LULG $4.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOGL | LULG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | C48 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D34 | C52Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GOGL and LULG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOGLC
LULGB
In short
LULG Leveraged single-stock ETFs mostly chase megacap tech. LULG points the same machinery at lululemon, aiming for 200% of the stock's daily move, and charges 0.75% to do it.
Stated mandate
LULG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of lululemon athletica inc stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOGL vs LULG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOGL vs LULG Cost
Overpaying LULG vs GOGL
$10,327
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
LULG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOGL | LULG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,336 | $971 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $5,078 | $3,657 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $14,482 | $10,327 |
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- 0.75%LULG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 312 funds
LULG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
GOGL vs LULG Dividends
- GOGL None
- LULG None
Distribution history
GOGL vs LULG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Worst fall
- GOGL LULG −86.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GOGL −3.37LULG −0.28
GOGL and LULG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

