GOGL ranks 123rd and MSTP 283rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GOGL vs MSTP
0.0%by weight
GOGL −1.47pt a year
0.20%1.67%
MSTP 3.5×the volume
18.9K66.2K
GOGL vs MSTP Performance
−41.9%+54.7%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- MSTP 1.67%
- GOGL $4M
- MSTP $15M
- GOGL
- MSTP −90.1%
- GOGL 1
- MSTP 2
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- MSTP 66.2K sh, better
- GOGL $15.14
- MSTP $22.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOGL | MSTP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F2 |
| Mission | A90 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | D31 |
| Tradability | C45 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D37 | B69Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GOGL and MSTP are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOGLC
MSTPD
In short
MSTP MicroStrategy is already a leveraged bet on bitcoin. MSTP stacks 2x the daily move on top of that, using swaps instead of shares and resetting every session. Built for day-trade horizons, by its own prospectus.
Stated mandate
MSTP The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of MicroStrategy Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses. It is intended as a daily, short-term leveraged exposure and is not expected to deliver twice the cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOGL vs MSTP Holdings
How GOGL and MSTP differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GOGL and 0.0% of MSTP.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GOGL and MSTP.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- GOGL199.4%
- MSTP100.0%
- GOGL0
- MSTP1
Asset class
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- MSTP
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in GOGL0
- In both0
- Only in MSTP1
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Only in MSTP
1 security, 66.7% of MSTP by weight
- Mstr66.69%
Weight gaps
GOGL and MSTP share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOGL vs MSTP Cost
Overpaying MSTP vs GOGL
$24,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
MSTP 1.67%
$28,637
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOGL | MSTP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $2,863 | $2,498 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $10,445 | $9,024 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $28,637 | $24,482 |
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- 1.67%MSTP
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
MSTP 308th cheapest of 315 funds
GOGL vs MSTP Dividends
- GOGL None
- MSTP None
Distribution history
GOGL vs MSTP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GOGL MSTP 144.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GOGL MSTP −0.86
- Worst fall
- GOGL MSTP −98.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GOGL −3.37MSTP 6.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.