PANG ranks 3rd and MSTP 283rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MSTP vs PANG
PANG −0.91pt a year
1.67%0.76%
MSTP 1.5×the volume
66.2K44.6K
MSTP vs PANG Performance
−90.1%+76.3%
- MSTP 1.67%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- MSTP $12M
- PANG $9M
- MSTP −90.1%
- PANG +76.3%, better
- MSTP 2
- PANG 4
- MSTP 66.2K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- MSTP $19.15
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSTP | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F2 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A90 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D31 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MSTP and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSTPD
PANGA
In short
MSTP MicroStrategy is already a leveraged bet on bitcoin. MSTP stacks 2x the daily move on top of that, using swaps instead of shares and resetting every session. Built for day-trade horizons, by its own prospectus.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
MSTP The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of MicroStrategy Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses. It is intended as a daily, short-term leveraged exposure and is not expected to deliver twice the cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSTP vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSTP vs PANG Cost
Overpaying MSTP vs PANG
$13,981
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSTP 1.67%
$28,637
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSTP | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,863 | $1,353 | $1,510 |
| 20 | $10,445 | $5,142 | $5,303 |
| 30 | $28,637 | $14,656 | $13,981 |
- 1.67%MSTP
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
MSTP 308th cheapest of 315 funds
MSTP vs PANG Dividends
- MSTP None
- PANG
- MSTP
- PANG $1.30
- MSTP
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- MSTP
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- MSTP
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
MSTP vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSTP 144.2%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSTP −0.86PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MSTP −98.4%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MSTP 6.34PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.67% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.67% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.