Skip to content

GQI vs PEPS

Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF

GQIANYSE Arca

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

PEPSBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PEPS −0.24pt a year

GQI0.34%PEPS0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

GQI 66.5×the volume

GQI24.2KPEPS364

GQI vs PEPS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+15.3%GQI+11.7%PEPS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GQI +15.3%. PEPS +11.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GQI 0.34%
PEPS 0.10%, better
Fund size
GQI $306M
PEPS $29M
1Y total return
GQI +15.3%, better
PEPS +11.7%
Yield (12M)
GQI 8.79%, better
PEPS 0.97%
Holdings
GQI 125
PEPS 203
Avg volume (30D)
GQI 24.2K sh, better
PEPS 364 sh
NAV per share
GQI $59.84
PEPS $32.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GQI: Cost 80, Risk 61, Mission 100, Tradability 56, Holdings 48, Durability 54. PEPS: Cost 100, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 74, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for GQI, PEPS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGQIPEPS
Cost30% weightA80A100Higher
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightB61HigherF24
Tradability15% weightB56HigherD31
Holdings10% weightC48A74Higher
Durability5% weightC54HigherD39

Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GQI and PEPS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Option Income⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

GQI ranks 6th and PEPS 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 5ARSPAInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 6AGQINatixis Gateway Quality Income ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 6AXYLDGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 20BISPYProShares S&P 500 High Income ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 20BPEPSParametric Equity Plus ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 20BXPAYRoundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GQIANatixis Gateway Quality Income ETF

PEPSBParametric Equity Plus ETF

In short

GQI Most S&P 500 income funds sell calls against the whole book. GQI writes options on half its equity, leaves the other half unencumbered, screens its stocks for quality, and pays monthly.

PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.

Stated mandate

GQI The Fund seeks current income with capital-appreciation potential. It invests in diversified high-quality U.S. common stocks and uses an options-selling overlay on 50% of the equity portfolio to support monthly cash distributions, enhance return, and reduce downside risk.

PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.

Why people hold it

  • GQI The options overlay covers 50% of the equity portfolio by design, so half the stock sleeve is never sitting under a call strike.
  • At 0.34%, it undercuts the 0.60% median of its S&P 500 options-income cohort, and sits well below peers like SPYI (0.68%) and XYLD (0.60%).
  • The equity side is a diversified basket of high-quality US common stocks, an advertised quality screen rather than a straight index clone.
  • Cash goes out monthly, and the portfolio tracks the mandate in its prospectus closely. Rated in the top quartile of a 51-fund cohort of S&P 500 income strategies.
  • PEPS 0.10% is index-fund pricing for an actively managed strategy. Even the cheap, well-regarded active peers cost more: DFAU at 0.12%, FELC at 0.18%.
  • Not a covered-call fund. The sold S&P 500 calls are paired with offsetting long exposure, so the overlay seeks incremental total return instead of capping upside.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF wrapper, U.S. large-cap equity, distributions paid quarterly. The complexity lives in the overlay, not the tax paperwork.
  • Cost is the standout: the typical active U.S. equity ETF in this group charges several times what PEPS does, and fee drag is the one input you know in advance.

Worth knowing

  • GQI Written calls cap gains on the covered half. That is the trade: option premium now in exchange for giving up part of a strong rally.
  • Shares are thinly traded, so the spread you pay getting in and out can matter more than the expense ratio.
  • A 2023 launch with an asset base in the tens to low hundreds of millions, smaller and younger than the household names in this category.
  • PEPS Launched in November 2024. The overlay has not yet run through a full market cycle, so there is limited history to judge it on.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than a mega-cap index ETF's, which shows up most on larger orders.
  • The options leg adds moving parts: short index calls lose value in a sharp rally, and the offsetting long exposure is what has to make that back.

Full GQI profile⁠

Full PEPS profile⁠

GQI vs PEPS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GQI vs PEPS Cost

Overpaying GQI vs PEPS

$4,826

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GQI 0.34%

    $6,932

  • PEPS 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GQI 0.34%
  • PEPS 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GQI $6,932PEPS $2,106

Year by year

YearGQIPEPSOverpaying
10$616$183$433
20$2,386$717$1,669
30$6,932$2,106$4,826

Expense ratio

  • 0.34%GQI
  • 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

PEPS cheapest of 51 funds

GQI 10th cheapest of 51 funds

GQI vs PEPS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GQI 8.79%, better
PEPS 0.97%
Payout (12M)
GQI $5.27
PEPS $0.32
Last payment
GQI $0.38
PEPS $0.09
Ex-dividend
GQI Oct 1, 2026
PEPS Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
GQI Oct 2, 2026
PEPS Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
GQI Monthly
PEPS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GQIMonthly · 34 paymentsAll GQI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.16; Feb 1, 2024 $0.39; Mar 1, 2024 $0.28; Apr 1, 2024 $0.32; May 1, 2024 $0.32; Jun 3, 2024 $0.38; Jul 1, 2024 $0.29; Aug 1, 2024 $0.31; Sep 3, 2024 $0.42; Oct 1, 2024 $0.38; Nov 1, 2024 $0.39; Dec 2, 2024 $0.42; Dec 20, 2024 $0.32; Feb 3, 2025 $0.38; Mar 3, 2025 $0.38; Apr 1, 2025 $0.40; May 1, 2025 $0.60; Jun 2, 2025 $0.62; Jul 1, 2025 $0.40; Aug 1, 2025 $0.42; Sep 2, 2025 $0.37; Oct 1, 2025 $0.34; Nov 3, 2025 $0.38; Dec 1, 2025 $0.40; Dec 30, 2025 $0.42; Feb 2, 2026 $0.47; Mar 2, 2026 $0.42; Apr 1, 2026 $0.53; May 1, 2026 $0.61; Jun 1, 2026 $0.39; Jul 1, 2026 $0.33; Aug 3, 2026 $0.52; Sep 1, 2026 $0.41; Oct 1, 2026 $0.38. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
PEPSQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll PEPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.06; Sep 22, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

GQI vs PEPS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GQI 8.8%since Jan 2024PEPS 12.9%since Dec 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GQI 1.20since Jan 2024PEPS 0.85since Dec 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GQI −16.5%since Dec 2023PEPS −21.3%since Nov 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GQI 0.71PEPS 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • GQIAvsCSHIA

    Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsCSHIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GQIAvsBALIA

    Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsBALIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GQIAvsIVVWA

    Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsIVVWA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.