RSPA ranks 5th and PEPS 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs RSPA
PEPS −0.19pt a year
0.10%0.29%
RSPA 700.3×the volume
364255K
PEPS vs RSPA Performance
+11.7%+15.4%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- RSPA 0.29%
- PEPS $29M
- RSPA $1.22B
- PEPS +11.7%
- RSPA +15.4%, better
- PEPS 0.97%
- RSPA 9.16%, better
- PEPS 203
- RSPA 526
- PEPS 364 sh
- RSPA 255K sh, better
- PEPS $32.59
- RSPA $53.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | RSPA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A87 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A80Higher |
| Durability | D39 | A70Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and RSPA are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
RSPAA
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
RSPA Most S&P 500 option-income funds sit on a megacap-led index. RSPA runs the equal-weight version instead: about 500 stocks at roughly even weight, income paid monthly, 0.29% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
RSPA The fund seeks exposure to the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while using an active option-income overlay. It is designed to generate consistent monthly income while retaining growth potential and lower volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs RSPA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs RSPA Cost
Overpaying RSPA vs PEPS
$3,846
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
RSPA 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | RSPA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $527 | $344 |
| 20 | $717 | $2,044 | $1,327 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $5,952 | $3,846 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.29%RSPA
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
RSPA 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs RSPA Dividends
- PEPS 0.97%
- RSPA 9.16%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- RSPA $4.87
- PEPS $0.09
- RSPA $0.41
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- RSPA Oct 19, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- RSPA Oct 23, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- RSPA Monthly
Distribution history
PEPS vs RSPA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%RSPA 9.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85RSPA 0.83
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%RSPA −15.4%
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02RSPA 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.