Skip to content

PEPS vs RSPA

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

PEPSBNasdaq

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF

RSPAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PEPS −0.19pt a year

PEPS0.10%RSPA0.29%

Avg volume · 30D

RSPA 700.3×the volume

PEPS364RSPA255K

PEPS vs RSPA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.7%PEPS+15.4%RSPA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PEPS +11.7%. RSPA +15.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PEPS 0.10%, better
RSPA 0.29%
Fund size
PEPS $29M
RSPA $1.22B
1Y total return
PEPS +11.7%
RSPA +15.4%, better
Yield (12M)
PEPS 0.97%
RSPA 9.16%, better
Holdings
PEPS 203
RSPA 526
Avg volume (30D)
PEPS 364 sh
RSPA 255K sh, better
NAV per share
PEPS $32.59
RSPA $53.02
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PEPS: Cost 100, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 74, Durability 39. RSPA: Cost 87, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 80, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for PEPS, RSPA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPEPSRSPA
Cost30% weightA100HigherA87
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF24A71Higher
Tradability15% weightD31B59Higher
Holdings10% weightA74A80Higher
Durability5% weightD39A70Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PEPS and RSPA are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Option Income⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

RSPA ranks 5th and PEPS 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 4AGPIXGoldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 5ARSPAInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 6AGQINatixis Gateway Quality Income ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 20BISPYProShares S&P 500 High Income ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 20BPEPSParametric Equity Plus ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 20BXPAYRoundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PEPSBParametric Equity Plus ETF

RSPAAInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF

In short

PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.

RSPA Most S&P 500 option-income funds sit on a megacap-led index. RSPA runs the equal-weight version instead: about 500 stocks at roughly even weight, income paid monthly, 0.29% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.

Stated mandate

PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.

RSPA The fund seeks exposure to the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while using an active option-income overlay. It is designed to generate consistent monthly income while retaining growth potential and lower volatility.

Why people hold it

  • PEPS 0.10% is index-fund pricing for an actively managed strategy. Even the cheap, well-regarded active peers cost more: DFAU at 0.12%, FELC at 0.18%.
  • Not a covered-call fund. The sold S&P 500 calls are paired with offsetting long exposure, so the overlay seeks incremental total return instead of capping upside.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF wrapper, U.S. large-cap equity, distributions paid quarterly. The complexity lives in the overlay, not the tax paperwork.
  • Cost is the standout: the typical active U.S. equity ETF in this group charges several times what PEPS does, and fee drag is the one input you know in advance.
  • RSPA Fully replicates the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, so its roughly 500 names carry similar weights and no handful of megacaps sets the tone.sec.gov
  • 0.29% net (0.32% gross) under a waiver through August 31, 2027, below its 52-fund category median. Ties GPIX, at 0.29% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027.
  • Income comes from short-term equity-linked notes capped at 10% of net assets, with cash and Treasury bills held alongside the stocks. Paid out monthly.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • Rates among the stronger builds in a crowded field of S&P 500 income-overlay funds.

Worth knowing

  • PEPS Launched in November 2024. The overlay has not yet run through a full market cycle, so there is limited history to judge it on.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than a mega-cap index ETF's, which shows up most on larger orders.
  • The options leg adds moving parts: short index calls lose value in a sharp rally, and the offsetting long exposure is what has to make that back.
  • RSPA The overlay trades away some of the index's upside for premium income, so strong rallies land softer than plain equal-weight exposure.invesco.comsec.gov
  • Income flows through notes issued by banks rather than listed calls the fund writes itself, which adds credit exposure to those issuers.sec.gov
  • Launched in July 2024, so the strategy has yet to be tested across a full market cycle.

Full PEPS profile⁠

Full RSPA profile⁠

PEPS vs RSPA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PEPS vs RSPA Cost

Overpaying RSPA vs PEPS

$3,846

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PEPS 0.10%

    $2,106

  • RSPA 0.29%

    $5,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PEPS 0.10%
  • RSPA 0.29%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530RSPA $5,952PEPS $2,106

Year by year

YearPEPSRSPAOverpaying
10$183$527$344
20$717$2,044$1,327
30$2,106$5,952$3,846

Expense ratio

  • 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
  • 0.29%RSPA
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

PEPS cheapest of 51 funds

RSPA 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PEPS vs RSPA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PEPS 0.97%
RSPA 9.16%, better
Payout (12M)
PEPS $0.32
RSPA $4.87
Last payment
PEPS $0.09
RSPA $0.41
Ex-dividend
PEPS Sep 21, 2026
RSPA Oct 19, 2026
Paid on
PEPS Sep 25, 2026
RSPA Oct 23, 2026
Frequency
PEPS Quarterly
RSPA Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

PEPSQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll PEPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.06; Sep 22, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
RSPAMonthly · 27 paymentsAll RSPA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 27 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Aug 19, 2024 $0.39; Sep 23, 2024 $0.40; Oct 21, 2024 $0.41; Nov 18, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.39; Jan 21, 2025 $0.40; Feb 24, 2025 $0.40; Mar 24, 2025 $0.38; Apr 21, 2025 $0.36; May 19, 2025 $0.38; Jun 23, 2025 $0.38; Jul 21, 2025 $0.39; Aug 18, 2025 $0.39; Sep 22, 2025 $0.40; Oct 20, 2025 $0.39; Nov 24, 2025 $0.39; Dec 22, 2025 $0.40; Jan 20, 2026 $0.41; Feb 23, 2026 $0.41; Mar 23, 2026 $0.39; Apr 20, 2026 $0.40; May 18, 2026 $0.40; Jun 22, 2026 $0.41; Jul 20, 2026 $0.42; Aug 24, 2026 $0.43; Sep 21, 2026 $0.41; Oct 19, 2026 $0.41. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

PEPS vs RSPA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PEPS 12.9%since Dec 2024RSPA 9.3%since Aug 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PEPS 0.85since Dec 2024RSPA 0.83since Aug 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PEPS −21.3%since Nov 2024RSPA −15.4%since Jul 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PEPS 1.02RSPA 0.58

Popular comparisons

  • PEPSBvsCSHIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPAAvsCSHIA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsBALIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPAAvsBALIA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsIVVWA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSPAAvsIVVWA

    Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.