Skip to content

GSIB vs PBEU

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF

GSIBBNasdaq

Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF

PBEUCNasdaq

Overlap

9.1%by weight

Expense ratio

PBEU −0.22pt a year

GSIB0.35%PBEU0.13%

Avg volume · 30D

PBEU 8.9×the volume

GSIB13.6KPBEU121K

GSIB vs PBEU Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.9%GSIB+5.6%PBEU

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GSIB +13.9%. PBEU +5.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%20%25%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GSIB 0.35%
PBEU 0.13%, better
Fund size
GSIB $39M
PBEU $416M
1Y total return
GSIB +26.7%
PBEU No data
Yield (12M)
GSIB 1.67%
PBEU No data
Holdings
GSIB 32
PBEU 60
Avg volume (30D)
GSIB 13.6K sh
PBEU 121K sh, better
NAV per share
GSIB $59.90
PBEU $30.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GSIB: Cost 62, Risk 82, Mission not scored, Tradability 28, Holdings 68, Durability 29. PBEU: Cost 93, Risk 17, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings 20, Durability 42.
Pillar letters and Scores for GSIB, PBEU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGSIBPBEU
Cost30% weightB62A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA82HigherF17
Tradability15% weightD28D30Higher
Holdings10% weightB68HigherF20
Durability5% weightD29C42Higher

Rank among Banks funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GSIB and PBEU are both graded against the same 9 Banks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Banks⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

GSIB ranks 4th and PBEU 5th of 9 funds in the Banks Category.

  1. Rank 1BKREState Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BKBEState Street SPDR S&P Bank ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 2BKBWBInvesco KBW Bank ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 4BGSIBThemes Global Systemically Important Banks ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CPBEUPortfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 6CFDIQInvesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GSIBBThemes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF

PBEUCPortfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF

In short

GSIB Most bank ETFs stop at the US border. GSIB goes after the other kind of bank: the world's systemically important ones, roughly 30 global megabanks in a single actively managed portfolio.

PBEU Most bank ETFs listed in the US stop at the US border. PBEU goes the other way, tracking the BITA European Banks Index, and charges 0.13% with no fee waiver involved.

Stated mandate

GSIB The Fund seeks growth of capital through an actively managed portfolio of equity securities issued by companies operating in the global banking sector.

PBEU The fund is an exchange-traded index vehicle focused on European banks.

Why people hold it

  • GSIB The niche is in the name: global systemically important banks, roughly 30 of them, rather than another basket of US regionals.
  • Genuinely global mandate. Most of the bank-ETF field is domestic (KBE, KBWB, KRE) or single-region (PBEU, European banks).
  • 0.35% expense ratio, right at the bank-ETF median, and you get an actively managed global sleeve for it instead of a plain index tracker.
  • Spread across megabanks in several regions, so no single country's banking system runs the whole fund. It grades out in the upper half of its bank-ETF peer group.
  • PBEU Charges 0.13%, and that is the stated fee with no waiver holding it down, while bank-sector peers KRE, KBE, KBWB and GSIB each charge 0.35%.
  • One ticker for European banks, a corner of the sector that US-listed bank funds mostly skip, built by tracking the rules-based BITA European Banks Index.sec.gov
  • Gathered a few hundred million in assets during its first year and trades moderately, real traction for a niche regional launch.

Worth knowing

  • GSIB Launched in 2023, so the live record is short and the asset base is still small next to the established bank ETFs.
  • Thinly traded for its category. Spreads can widen, and limit orders do the heavy lifting.
  • One sector, roughly 30 names, and distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • PBEU Launched November 2025, so the track record is short and risk measures rest on roughly a year of history.
  • One sector in one region, and non-US listings mean exchange-rate moves ride along with bank fundamentals.sec.gov
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, and it trades moderately rather than like the sector's heaviest names, so spreads can run wider.

Full GSIB profile⁠

Full PBEU profile⁠

GSIB vs PBEU Holdings

How GSIB and PBEU differ

Overlap by weight

9.1%

Shared holdings make up 11.2% of PBEU and 9.5% of GSIB.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both9.1%
  • Countryby domicile28.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for PBEU.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GSIB and PBEU, widest gap first
CountryMore in GSIBMore in PBEU
United StatesGSIB +28.9 points
ChinaGSIB +19.8 points
United KingdomPBEU +17.9 points
SpainPBEU +16.4 points
ItalyPBEU +15.1 points
JapanGSIB +10.6 points
SwedenPBEU +8.1 points
CanadaGSIB +7.8 points
Other countries (10)PBEU +9.5 points

Outside the US: GSIB 72% developed, 28% emerging. PBEU 100% developed, 0% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GSIB39.0%
  • PBEU59.4%

Securities held

  • GSIB31
  • PBEU51

Asset class

GSIB
Equity
PBEU
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GSIB28
  • In both3
  • Only in PBEU48

Only in GSIB

28 securities, 90.2% of GSIB by weight

  • Agricultural Bank of China Ltd4.16%
  • Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd4.07%
  • China Construction Bank Corp4.06%

Only in PBEU

48 securities, 87.1% of PBEU by weight

  • Hsbc Holdings PLC14.21%
  • Banco Santander SA8.45%
  • Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argenta6.64%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GSIB and PBEU, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GSIBMore in PBEU
BNP Paribas SABNPQYPBEU +1.67 points
Barclays PLCBCSPBEU +0.42 points
Societe Generale SAGSIB +0.40 points

All 29 GSIB holdings⁠All PBEU holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GSIB vs PBEU Cost

Overpaying GSIB vs PBEU

$4,400

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GSIB 0.35%

    $7,126

  • PBEU 0.13%

    $2,726

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GSIB 0.35%
  • PBEU 0.13%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GSIB $7,126PBEU $2,726

Year by year

YearGSIBPBEUOverpaying
10$634$238$396
20$2,454$930$1,524
30$7,126$2,726$4,400

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%GSIB
  • 0.13%PBEU, cheaper
  • Middle half of Banks funds
  • Median 0.35%

PBEU cheapest of 9 funds

GSIB 2nd cheapest of 9 funds

GSIB vs PBEU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GSIB 1.67%
PBEU No data
Payout (12M)
GSIB $1.00
PBEU No data
Last payment
GSIB $1.00
PBEU $0.0026
Ex-dividend
GSIB Dec 18, 2025
PBEU Dec 24, 2025
Paid on
GSIB Dec 19, 2025
PBEU Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
GSIB Irregular
PBEU Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

GSIBIrregular · 2 paymentsAll GSIB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.55; Dec 18, 2025 $1.00. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD
PBEUIrregular · 1 paymentAll PBEU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2025 $0.0026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

GSIB vs PBEU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GSIB 13.4%since Jan 2024PBEU No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GSIB 2.12since Jan 2024PBEU No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GSIB −17.7%since Dec 2023PBEU No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GSIB 0.58PBEU 0.88

GSIB and PBEU in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GSIBBvsKREB

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBEUCvsKREB

    Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSIBBvsKBEB

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBEUCvsKBEB

    Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSIBBvsKBWBB

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF · Invesco KBW Bank ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBEUCvsKBWBB

    Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF · Invesco KBW Bank ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.