Skip to content

GSLC vs ILCV

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

GSLCANYSE Arca

iShares Morningstar Value ETF

ILCVANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ILCV −0.05pt a year

GSLC0.09%ILCV0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

GSLC 11.0×the volume

GSLC268KILCV24.4K

10Y return · a year

GSLC +2.3pt

GSLC+14.6%ILCV+12.3%

GSLC vs ILCV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+67.6%GSLC+81.1%ILCV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GSLC +67.6%. ILCV +81.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GSLC 0.09%
ILCV 0.04%, better
Fund size
GSLC $15.2B
ILCV $1.37B
1Y total return
GSLC +10.5%
ILCV +21.0%, better
Yield (12M)
GSLC 1.03%
ILCV 1.51%, better
Holdings
GSLC 428
ILCV 375
Avg volume (30D)
GSLC 268K sh, better
ILCV 24.4K sh
NAV per share
GSLC $146.90
ILCV $109.27
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GSLC: Cost 93, Risk 52, Mission 92, Tradability 75, Holdings 38, Durability 78. ILCV: Cost 99, Risk 90, Mission 82, Tradability 64, Holdings 39, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for GSLC, ILCV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGSLCILCV
Cost30% weightA93A99Higher
Mission25% weightA92HigherA82
Risk15% weightC52A90Higher
Tradability15% weightA75HigherB64
Holdings10% weightD38D39Higher
Durability5% weightA78A82Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GSLC and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

ILCV ranks 2nd and GSLC 11th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 9AGVUSGoldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 11AGSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 12ARECSColumbia Research Enhanced Core ETFScore 76

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GSLCAGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

ILCVAiShares Morningstar Value ETF

In short

GSLC Goldman's first ETF, out in 2015, packs value, momentum, quality and low volatility into one large-cap portfolio and charges 0.09% for it. Multifactor machinery at index-fund pricing, with tilts kept deliberately modest.

ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.

Stated mandate

GSLC The Fund seeks to track the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, which provides exposure to large-capitalization U.S. issuers.

ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.

Why people hold it

  • GSLC 0.09% a year, against a roughly 0.32% median for US multifactor funds. Factor exposure priced like plain beta.
  • Four factors (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) each get their own sleeve, combined in equal weights and rebalanced quarterly. No guessing which style leads.sec.gov
  • The index rules include a turnover minimization step that skips trades not worth making, which holds down the churn factor strategies are known for.solactive.com
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund running since 2015 that tracks its index tightly, and one of the strongest implementations in the US multifactor group.
  • ILCV Charges 0.04% a year against a 0.32% median for its factor peer group. Undercuts well-regarded rivals like VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Value gets defined five ways: forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow and dividend yield. Wider lens than a single price-to-book screen.ishares.com
  • Spreads the bet across about 400 large- and mid-cap names and distributes quarterly.
  • Trading since 2004 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it ranks among the strongest implementations in its factor cohort.

Worth knowing

  • GSLC About 400 large-cap US names drawn from a broad reference index, so the tilts are a nudge on top of the market rather than a break from it.sec.gov
  • Cheaper cohort options exist (VYM at 0.04%, VONV at 0.06%), the trade-off being a single style instead of four blended together.
  • A proprietary Goldman index, not a household benchmark, so results can part ways with the standard large-cap yardstick in either direction. Pays quarterly.
  • ILCV One of the quieter tickers in its category. Thin volume means spreads matter more here than on a mega-cap index fund, and limit orders are the usual tool.
  • Value-only by design. It skips the market's priciest growth leaders, so it moves differently from a total-market fund in both directions.ishares.com
  • Large and mid caps only. Small-cap value sits outside the mandate.

Full GSLC profile⁠

Full ILCV profile⁠

GSLC vs ILCV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GSLC vs ILCV Cost

Overpaying GSLC vs ILCV

$1,049

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GSLC 0.09%

    $1,898

  • ILCV 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GSLC 0.09%
  • ILCV 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K051015202530GSLC $1,898ILCV $849

Year by year

YearGSLCILCVOverpaying
10$165$73$92
20$646$288$358
30$1,898$849$1,049

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%GSLC
  • 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

ILCV cheapest of 99 funds

GSLC 7th cheapest of 99 funds

GSLC vs ILCV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GSLC 1.03%
ILCV 1.51%, better
Payout (12M)
GSLC $1.48
ILCV $1.65
Last payment
GSLC $0.46
ILCV $0.42
Ex-dividend
GSLC Sep 24, 2026
ILCV Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
GSLC Sep 30, 2026
ILCV Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
GSLC Quarterly
ILCV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GSLCQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll GSLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.20; Jun 23, 2017 $0.21; Sep 22, 2017 $0.25; Dec 21, 2017 $0.25; Mar 23, 2018 $0.21; Jun 25, 2018 $0.23; Sep 24, 2018 $0.24; Dec 24, 2018 $0.27; Mar 25, 2019 $0.23; Jun 24, 2019 $0.25; Sep 24, 2019 $0.24; Dec 24, 2019 $0.28; Mar 25, 2020 $0.31; Jun 24, 2020 $0.25; Sep 24, 2020 $0.21; Dec 24, 2020 $0.25; Mar 25, 2021 $0.23; Jun 24, 2021 $0.22; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 27, 2021 $0.31; Mar 25, 2022 $0.29; Jun 24, 2022 $0.30; Sep 26, 2022 $0.29; Dec 27, 2022 $0.35; Mar 27, 2023 $0.28; Jun 26, 2023 $0.33; Sep 25, 2023 $0.27; Dec 26, 2023 $0.41; Mar 22, 2024 $0.31; Jun 24, 2024 $0.31; Sep 24, 2024 $0.30; Dec 23, 2024 $0.36; Mar 25, 2025 $0.34; Jun 24, 2025 $0.33; Sep 24, 2025 $0.32; Dec 23, 2025 $0.34; Mar 25, 2026 $0.34; Jun 24, 2026 $0.34; Sep 24, 2026 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
ILCVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll ILCV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.28; Jun 27, 2017 $0.30; Sep 26, 2017 $0.31; Dec 19, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.33; Jun 26, 2018 $0.35; Sep 26, 2018 $0.34; Dec 17, 2018 $0.39; Mar 20, 2019 $0.35; Jun 17, 2019 $0.34; Sep 24, 2019 $0.44; Dec 16, 2019 $0.45; Mar 25, 2020 $0.44; Jun 15, 2020 $0.40; Sep 23, 2020 $0.41; Dec 14, 2020 $0.40; Mar 25, 2021 $0.36; Jun 10, 2021 $0.25; Sep 24, 2021 $0.39; Dec 13, 2021 $0.40; Mar 24, 2022 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.27; Sep 26, 2022 $0.47; Dec 13, 2022 $0.40; Mar 23, 2023 $0.36; Jun 7, 2023 $0.30; Sep 26, 2023 $0.45; Dec 20, 2023 $0.48; Mar 21, 2024 $0.35; Jun 11, 2024 $0.37; Sep 25, 2024 $0.46; Dec 17, 2024 $0.43; Mar 18, 2025 $0.38; Jun 16, 2025 $0.40; Sep 16, 2025 $0.40; Dec 16, 2025 $0.48; Mar 17, 2026 $0.36; Jun 15, 2026 $0.39; Sep 15, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

GSLC vs ILCV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GSLC
  • ILCV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GSLC −24.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GSLC 12.3%ILCV 10.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GSLC 1.33ILCV 1.57, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GSLC −24.9%ILCV −18.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GSLC 0.96ILCV 0.82

GSLC and ILCV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GSLCAvsVONVA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsVONVA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSLCAvsVYMA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsVYMA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSLCAvsIMCVA

    Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ILCVAvsIMCVA

    iShares Morningstar Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.