VYM ranks 2nd and GSLC 11th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
GSLC vs VYM
VYM −0.05pt a year
0.09%0.04%
VYM 4.3×the volume
268K1.14M
GSLC +2.6pt
+14.6%+12.0%
GSLC vs VYM Performance
+67.6%+74.3%
- GSLC 0.09%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- GSLC $15.2B
- VYM $95.8B
- GSLC +10.5%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- GSLC 1.03%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- GSLC 428
- VYM 601
- GSLC 268K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- GSLC $146.90
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSLC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A92Higher | A79 |
| Risk | C52 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D38 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A78 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSLC and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSLCA
VYMA
In short
GSLC Goldman's first ETF, out in 2015, packs value, momentum, quality and low volatility into one large-cap portfolio and charges 0.09% for it. Multifactor machinery at index-fund pricing, with tilts kept deliberately modest.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
GSLC The Fund seeks to track the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, which provides exposure to large-capitalization U.S. issuers.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSLC vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSLC vs VYM Cost
Overpaying GSLC vs VYM
$1,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSLC 0.09%
$1,898
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSLC | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $73 | $92 |
| 20 | $646 | $288 | $358 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $849 | $1,049 |
- 0.09%GSLC
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
GSLC 7th cheapest of 99 funds
GSLC vs VYM Dividends
- GSLC 1.03%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- GSLC $1.48
- VYM $3.68
- GSLC $0.46
- VYM $0.89
- GSLC Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- GSLC Sep 30, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- GSLC Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
GSLC vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GSLC
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSLC 12.3%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GSLC 1.33VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- GSLC −24.9%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GSLC 0.96VYM 0.75
GSLC and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




