XHLF ranks 4th and GSST 20th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
GSST vs XHLF
XHLF −0.13pt a year
0.16%0.03%
XHLF 1.3×the volume
242K309K
GSST +1.0pt
+5.4%+4.4%
GSST vs XHLF Performance
+4.0%+3.6%
- GSST 0.16%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- GSST $1.75B
- XHLF $2.03B
- GSST +4.0%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- GSST 4.19%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- GSST 404
- XHLF 29
- GSST 242K sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- GSST $50.46
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSST | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B59Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C48 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A77Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. GSST and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSSTA
XHLFA
In short
GSST Goldman's first actively managed ETF, and it acts like it. Instead of a plain T-bill ladder, GSST roams across government, bank, corporate, mortgage-backed, asset-backed and CLO paper at ultra-short maturities, and pays income monthly.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
GSST The Fund seeks current income while preserving capital. It invests at least 80% of net assets in a broad range of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds, including government, bank, corporate, short-term, mortgage-backed, asset-backed and CLO securities.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSST vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSST vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying GSST vs XHLF
$2,704
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSST 0.16%
$3,342
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSST | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $55 | $237 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $216 | $925 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $638 | $2,704 |
- 0.16%GSST
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
GSST 32nd cheapest of 78 funds
GSST vs XHLF Dividends
- GSST 4.19%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- GSST $2.12
- XHLF $1.89
- GSST $0.19
- XHLF $0.15
- GSST Oct 1, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- GSST Oct 7, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- GSST Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
GSST vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSST 0.6%XHLF 0.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GSST 1.59, betterXHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- GSST −1.2%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GSST 0.07XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.