IUSB ranks 2nd and GTO 33rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
GTO vs IUSB
IUSB −0.29pt a year
0.35%0.06%
IUSB 20.9×the volume
293K6.13M
GTO +0.8pt
+2.5%+1.7%
GTO vs IUSB Performance
−1.5%+0.9%
- GTO 0.35%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- GTO $2.57B
- IUSB $50.2B
- GTO −0.1%
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- GTO 4.94%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- GTO 1901
- IUSB 18280
- GTO 293K sh
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- GTO $45.27
- IUSB $44.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GTO | IUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A85 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A85 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. GTO and IUSB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GTOA
IUSBA
In short
GTO The active take on the boring middle of your bond shelf: no index to hug, just a mandate to pull total return from income plus price gains. Priced at 0.35%, right about what the average bond ETF charges.
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
Stated mandate
GTO The fund seeks maximum total return through a combination of income and capital appreciation.
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GTO vs IUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GTO vs IUSB Cost
Overpaying GTO vs IUSB
$5,856
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GTO 0.35%
$7,126
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GTO | IUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $110 | $524 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $432 | $2,022 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,270 | $5,856 |
- 0.35%GTO
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
GTO 60th cheapest of 114 funds
GTO vs IUSB Dividends
- GTO 4.94%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- GTO $2.24
- IUSB $1.94
- GTO $0.19
- IUSB $0.15
- GTO Oct 19, 2026
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- GTO Oct 23, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- GTO Monthly
- IUSB Monthly
Distribution history
GTO vs IUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GTO
- IUSB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GTO 5.7%IUSB 5.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GTO 0.27, betterIUSB 0.25
- Worst fall
- GTO −19.8%IUSB −17.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GTO 1.00IUSB 0.96
GTO and IUSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
