SPAB ranks 2nd and GTO 33rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
GTO vs SPAB
SPAB −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SPAB 10.6×the volume
293K3.11M
GTO +1.1pt
+2.5%+1.4%
GTO vs SPAB Performance
−1.5%−0.9%
- GTO 0.35%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- GTO $2.57B
- SPAB $10.4B
- GTO −0.1%, better
- SPAB −0.2%
- GTO 4.94%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- GTO 1901
- SPAB 8697
- GTO 293K sh
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- GTO $45.27
- SPAB $24.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GTO | SPAB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A85 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A85 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. GTO and SPAB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GTOA
SPABA
In short
GTO The active take on the boring middle of your bond shelf: no index to hug, just a mandate to pull total return from income plus price gains. Priced at 0.35%, right about what the average bond ETF charges.
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
Stated mandate
GTO The fund seeks maximum total return through a combination of income and capital appreciation.
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GTO vs SPAB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GTO vs SPAB Cost
Overpaying GTO vs SPAB
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GTO 0.35%
$7,126
SPAB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GTO | SPAB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%GTO
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
GTO 60th cheapest of 114 funds
GTO vs SPAB Dividends
- GTO 4.94%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- GTO $2.24
- SPAB $1.04
- GTO $0.19
- SPAB $0.09
- GTO Oct 19, 2026
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- GTO Oct 23, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- GTO Monthly
- SPAB Monthly
Distribution history
GTO vs SPAB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GTO
- SPAB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GTO 5.7%SPAB 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GTO 0.27, betterSPAB 0.17
- Worst fall
- GTO −19.8%SPAB −17.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GTO 1.00SPAB 1.00Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
GTO and SPAB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

