SCHZ ranks 2nd and GTOS 61st of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
GTOS vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.27pt a year
0.30%0.03%
SCHZ 346.4×the volume
6.84K2.37M
GTOS +0.1pt
+5.5%+5.4%
GTOS vs SCHZ Performance
+2.6%−0.2%
- GTOS 0.30%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- GTOS $124M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- GTOS +2.6%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- GTOS 4.53%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- GTOS 764
- SCHZ 12610
- GTOS 6.84K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- GTOS $24.65
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GTOS | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56 | A97Higher |
| Mission | C50 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A89Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C44 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A78Higher |
| Durability | C46 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. GTOS and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GTOSB
SCHZA
In short
GTOS Invesco's active take on short bonds: maturity and duration held between one and three years, with room to reach into high yield for income. The fee is 0.30% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, near the category norm.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
GTOS The Fund seeks total return from income and capital appreciation. It invests at least 80% of net assets in fixed income securities, including high yield bonds, and aims for portfolio maturity and duration between one and three years.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GTOS vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GTOS vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying GTOS vs SCHZ
$5,511
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GTOS 0.30%
$6,149
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GTOS | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $55 | $490 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $216 | $1,897 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $638 | $5,511 |
- 0.30%GTOS
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
GTOS 51st cheapest of 114 funds
GTOS vs SCHZ Dividends
- GTOS 4.53%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- GTOS $1.12
- SCHZ $0.96
- GTOS $0.11
- SCHZ $0.08
- GTOS Oct 19, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- GTOS Oct 23, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- GTOS Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
GTOS vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GTOS 1.7%, betterSCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GTOS 0.54, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- GTOS −1.4%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GTOS 0.07SCHZ 0.99
GTOS and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
