TAXS ranks 4th and GUMI 6th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
GUMI vs TAXS
TAXS −0.11pt a year
0.16%0.05%
TAXS 1.1×the volume
25.8K28.9K
GUMI vs TAXS Performance
+3.0%+2.6%
- GUMI 0.16%
- TAXS 0.05%, better
- GUMI $87M
- TAXS $194M
- GUMI +3.0%, better
- TAXS +2.6%
- GUMI 2.61%, better
- TAXS 2.38%
- GUMI 211
- TAXS 2424
- GUMI 25.8K sh
- TAXS 28.9K sh, better
- GUMI $50.41
- TAXS $50.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUMI | TAXS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | A70Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | C53Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | C51 | A81Higher |
| Durability | D33 | C42Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. GUMI and TAXS are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUMIA
TAXSA
In short
GUMI Goldman keeps this muni portfolio on a six-month leash: active management, tax-exempt income, and minimal rate sensitivity. In a cohort of short-term muni funds, it sits at the ultra-short end and costs less than the typical rival.
TAXS Northern Trust's muni index fund keeps every bond under five years to maturity and charges 0.05%, a fraction of the typical muni ETF fee. Roughly 1,700 federally tax-exempt bonds, none of them AMT bonds, with interest paid monthly.
Stated mandate
GUMI The Fund seeks high current income with relatively low principal volatility, aiming for income exempt from regular federal income tax. It normally invests at least 80% of its assets plus investment borrowings in tax-exempt municipal securities.
TAXS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE Short-term Focused Municipal Bond Index. It is designed for tax-exempt income through passively managed, investment-grade municipal bonds with short-term maturities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUMI vs TAXS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUMI vs TAXS Cost
Overpaying GUMI vs TAXS
$2,282
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUMI 0.16%
$3,342
TAXS 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUMI | TAXS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $92 | $200 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $360 | $781 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $1,060 | $2,282 |
- 0.16%GUMI
- 0.05%TAXS, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
TAXS cheapest of 27 funds
GUMI 7th cheapest of 27 funds
GUMI vs TAXS Dividends
- GUMI 2.61%, better
- TAXS 2.38%
- GUMI $1.32
- TAXS $1.20
- GUMI $0.11
- TAXS $0.11
- GUMI Oct 1, 2026
- TAXS Oct 1, 2026
- GUMI Oct 7, 2026
- TAXS Oct 7, 2026
- GUMI Monthly
- TAXS Monthly
Distribution history
GUMI vs TAXS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUMI 0.6%TAXS 2.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUMI −1.91TAXS −0.51
- Worst fall
- GUMI −0.5%TAXS −1.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GUMI 0.01TAXS 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.