VTES ranks 1st and GUMI 6th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
GUMI vs VTES
VTES −0.11pt a year
0.16%0.05%
VTES 19.3×the volume
25.8K498K
GUMI vs VTES Performance
+3.0%+1.6%
- GUMI 0.16%
- VTES 0.05%, better
- GUMI $87M
- VTES $3.6B
- GUMI +3.0%, better
- VTES +1.6%
- GUMI 2.61%
- VTES 2.67%, better
- GUMI 211
- VTES 3913
- GUMI 25.8K sh
- VTES 498K sh, better
- GUMI $50.41
- VTES $100.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUMI | VTES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | A70Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C53 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | B63Higher |
| Durability | D33 | A83Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. GUMI and VTES are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUMIA
VTESA
In short
GUMI Goldman keeps this muni portfolio on a six-month leash: active management, tax-exempt income, and minimal rate sensitivity. In a cohort of short-term muni funds, it sits at the ultra-short end and costs less than the typical rival.
VTES Vanguard's muni ETF on a short leash: an AMT-free tax-exempt index, but capped at seven years to trim interest-rate sensitivity. Five basis points, roughly 2,700 bonds, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
GUMI The Fund seeks high current income with relatively low principal volatility, aiming for income exempt from regular federal income tax. It normally invests at least 80% of its assets plus investment borrowings in tax-exempt municipal securities.
VTES The Fund seeks to track an index representing investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds with remaining maturities from one month through seven years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUMI vs VTES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUMI vs VTES Cost
Overpaying GUMI vs VTES
$2,282
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUMI 0.16%
$3,342
VTES 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUMI | VTES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $92 | $200 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $360 | $781 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $1,060 | $2,282 |
- 0.16%GUMI
- 0.05%VTES, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
VTES cheapest of 27 funds
GUMI 7th cheapest of 27 funds
GUMI vs VTES Dividends
- GUMI 2.61%
- VTES 2.67%, better
- GUMI $1.32
- VTES $2.69
- GUMI $0.11
- VTES $0.19
- GUMI Oct 1, 2026
- VTES Oct 1, 2026
- GUMI Oct 7, 2026
- VTES Oct 5, 2026
- GUMI Monthly
- VTES Monthly
Distribution history
GUMI vs VTES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUMI 0.6%VTES 2.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUMI −1.91VTES −0.33
- Worst fall
- GUMI −0.5%VTES −3.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GUMI 0.01VTES 0.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.