USCA ranks 2nd and HAPI 18th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
HAPI vs USCA
USCA −0.28pt a year
0.35%0.07%
USCA 47.0×the volume
2.08K97.9K
HAPI +1.5pt
+22.8%+21.3%
HAPI vs USCA Performance
+10.9%+6.8%
- HAPI 0.35%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- HAPI $493M
- USCA $3.42B
- HAPI +10.9%, better
- USCA +6.8%
- HAPI 0.79%
- USCA 1.06%, better
- HAPI 157
- USCA 392
- HAPI 2.08K sh
- USCA 97.9K sh, better
- HAPI $45.19
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HAPI | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A88 | A91Higher |
| Risk | B67Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | F16 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D36Higher | D29 |
| Durability | F21 | C49Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. HAPI and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HAPIC
USCAA
In short
HAPI Most factor funds screen balance sheets. HAPI screens culture, tracking an index that picks roughly 150 U.S. large caps using a proprietary corporate-culture score. A human-capital bet in a plain index wrapper.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
HAPI The Fund uses an indexing strategy to track the Human Capital Factor Large Cap Index, investing at least 80% of assets in index securities. The index selects roughly 150 U.S. companies using a proprietary corporate-culture scoring methodology.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HAPI vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HAPI vs USCA Cost
Overpaying HAPI vs USCA
$5,646
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HAPI 0.35%
$7,126
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HAPI | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $128 | $506 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $503 | $1,951 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,480 | $5,646 |
- 0.35%HAPI
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
HAPI 19th cheapest of 30 funds
HAPI vs USCA Dividends
- HAPI 0.79%
- USCA 1.06%, better
- HAPI $0.36
- USCA $0.47
- HAPI $0.36
- USCA $0.10
- HAPI Dec 19, 2025
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- HAPI Dec 24, 2025
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- HAPI Annual
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
HAPI vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HAPI 12.0%, betterUSCA 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- HAPI 1.42, betterUSCA 1.27
- Worst fall
- HAPI −19.5%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- HAPI 0.90USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.