HAUZ ranks 3rd and RWO 7th of 18 funds in the Global & International Real Estate Category.
HAUZ vs RWO
HAUZ −0.40pt a year
0.10%0.50%
RWO 1.1×the volume
117K124K
RWO +1.6pt
+2.3%+3.9%
HAUZ vs RWO Performance
−10.6%+5.3%
- HAUZ 0.10%, better
- RWO 0.50%
- HAUZ $1.06B
- RWO $1.25B
- HAUZ −4.6%
- RWO +9.5%, better
- HAUZ 3.81%, better
- RWO 3.42%
- HAUZ 400
- RWO 243
- HAUZ 117K sh
- RWO 124K sh, better
- HAUZ $21.46
- RWO $47.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HAUZ | RWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A82 | A94Higher |
| Risk | C40 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B68 | A81Higher |
Rank among Global & International Real Estate funds
Same Category. HAUZ and RWO are both graded against the same 18 Global & International Real Estate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HAUZA
RWOB
In short
HAUZ The bargain passport for property: HAUZ owns real estate companies everywhere except the US, developed and emerging alike, for 0.10% a year. One of the cheapest ways to own the rest of the world's landlords.
RWO Global real estate without the assembly work: about 220 property companies across the US, developed markets and emerging markets, wrapped in one Dow Jones index fund that has been running since 2008.
Stated mandate
HAUZ The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the performance of an iSTOXX Developed and Emerging benchmark.
RWO The fund seeks to track the total return performance of the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index and provide global exposure to publicly traded real estate securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HAUZ vs RWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HAUZ vs RWO Cost
Overpaying RWO vs HAUZ
$7,873
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HAUZ 0.10%
$2,106
RWO 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HAUZ | RWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $900 | $717 |
| 20 | $717 | $3,460 | $2,743 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $9,979 | $7,873 |
- 0.10%HAUZ, cheaper
- 0.50%RWO
- Middle half of Global & International Real Estate funds
- Median 0.49%
HAUZ cheapest of 18 funds
RWO 10th cheapest of 18 funds
HAUZ vs RWO Dividends
- HAUZ 3.81%, better
- RWO 3.42%
- HAUZ $0.82
- RWO $1.63
- HAUZ $0.24
- RWO $0.43
- HAUZ Jun 18, 2026
- RWO Sep 21, 2026
- HAUZ Jun 26, 2026
- RWO Sep 23, 2026
- HAUZ Twice a year
- RWO Quarterly
Distribution history
HAUZ vs RWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HAUZ
- RWO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HAUZ 16.4%RWO 15.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HAUZ 0.33RWO 0.60, better
- Worst fall
- HAUZ −33.6%RWO −32.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HAUZ 1.01RWO 0.91
HAUZ and RWO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
