Skip to content

HAWG vs TOAK

HCM Hedged Equity ETF

HAWG—NYSE Arca

Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

TOAKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TOAK −1.09pt a year

HAWG1.35%TOAK0.26%

Avg volume · 30D

HAWG 6.2×the volume

HAWG67.9KTOAK10.9K

HAWG vs TOAK Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−2.2%HAWG+0.3%TOAK

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. HAWG −2.2%. TOAK +0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1%1%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
HAWG 1.35%
TOAK 0.26%, better
Fund size
HAWG $99M
TOAK $101M
1Y total return
HAWG No data
TOAK +3.6%
Holdings
HAWG 488
TOAK 3
Avg volume (30D)
HAWG 67.9K sh, better
TOAK 10.9K sh
NAV per share
HAWG $29.68
TOAK $29.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —HAWGNot yet graded
TOAK: Cost 86, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for HAWG, TOAK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHAWGTOAK
Cost30% weightNot scoredA86
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightNot scoredB61
Tradability15% weightNot scoredB60
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightNot scoredC47

Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds

US Active Low Volatility⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

TOAK ranks 3rd of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.

  1. Rank 1ASELVSEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACGCVCapital Group Conservative Equity ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3ATOAKTwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BLOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETFScore 61
  5. HAWGNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HAWG—HCM Hedged Equity ETF

TOAKATwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

In short

HAWG No data

TOAK Shelved with low-volatility equity funds, TOAK owns no stocks. It runs a paired options book with a zero-to-one-year horizon, each position's maximum loss limited to the premium paid, at 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

HAWG No data

TOAK The Fund seeks capital appreciation with low price volatility, which the Adviser describes as stable returns. It pursues this through defined-risk options intended to generate an absolute return over a short, zero-to-one-year duration.

Why people hold it

HAWG No data

  • TOAK Defined risk is written into the strategy: the most any single option position can lose in an expiry period is the premium paid, and the fund states it uses no leverage and sells no naked options.sec.gov
  • 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.46% gross) sits below the category median and under peers such as LOWV at 0.39% and SIXL at 0.46%.
  • Long calls are always paired with long puts (and call spreads with put spreads), legs that tend to move against each other. That pairing is the stated engine behind the low-volatility half of the mandate.sec.gov
  • Different wiring from its shelf-mates: an absolute-return options sleeve on broad US equity exposure rather than a screened basket of defensive stocks, and it stands in the upper half of that peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

HAWG No data

  • TOAK Launched in 2024, so the track record is short and covers only one market stretch. It is also a smaller fund than most names on this shelf.
  • Thinly traded for its category, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the big liquid names. Limit orders matter more here.
  • No income stream: the fund has not been paying distributions, so whatever the options book produces shows up in share price, not as yield.

Full HAWG profile⁠

Full TOAK profile⁠

HAWG vs TOAK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HAWG vs TOAK Cost

Overpaying HAWG vs TOAK

$18,755

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HAWG 1.35%

    $24,113

  • TOAK 0.26%

    $5,358

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HAWG 1.35%
  • TOAK 0.26%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530HAWG $24,113TOAK $5,358

Year by year

YearHAWGTOAKOverpaying
10$2,346$473$1,873
20$8,678$1,838$6,840
30$24,113$5,358$18,755

Expense ratio

  • 1.35%HAWG
  • 0.26%TOAK, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
  • Median 0.47%

TOAK 2nd cheapest of 10 funds

HAWG 10th cheapest of 10 funds

HAWG vs TOAK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
HAWG None
TOAK None

Distribution history

HAWGAll HAWG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TOAKAll TOAK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

HAWG vs TOAK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HAWG No dataTOAK 0.3%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HAWG No dataTOAK −0.72since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HAWG No dataTOAK −1.8%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HAWG 0.00TOAK 0.0003

HAWG and TOAK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • HAWG—vsSELVA

    HCM Hedged Equity ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.35% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsSELVA

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HAWG—vsCGCVA

    HCM Hedged Equity ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.35% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsCGCVA

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HAWG—vsLOWVB

    HCM Hedged Equity ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsLOWVB

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.