HBDC ranks 2nd and HFND 15th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HBDC vs HFND
HBDC −0.68pt a year
0.39%1.07%
HFND 1.1×the volume
7.84K8.51K
HBDC vs HFND Performance
+2.0%+2.6%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- HFND 1.07%
- HBDC $90M
- HFND $37M
- HBDC +2.0%
- HFND +2.6%, better
- HBDC 5.15%, better
- HFND 4.87%
- HBDC 156
- HFND 33
- HBDC 7.84K sh
- HFND 8.51K sh, better
- HBDC $24.37
- HFND $23.76
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBDC | HFND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B55 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C48Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | C49 | C49 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HBDC and HFND are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBDCA
HFNDC
In short
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
HFND A hedge fund index fund that owns no hedge funds. Machine learning reads the industry's reported returns, then rebuilds that positioning with long and short broad ETFs and futures inside a daily-traded ETF.
Stated mandate
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
HFND The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is actively managed and aims to replicate the return characteristics of the hedge-fund industry, using long and short positions in broad-based ETFs and futures contracts.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBDC vs HFND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBDC vs HFND Cost
Overpaying HFND vs HBDC
$11,917
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
HFND 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBDC | HFND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,881 | $1,176 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $7,046 | $4,321 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $19,815 | $11,917 |
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- 1.07%HFND
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
HFND 14th cheapest of 29 funds
HBDC vs HFND Dividends
- HBDC 5.15%, better
- HFND 4.87%
- HBDC $1.25
- HFND $1.15
- HBDC $0.11
- HFND $1.15
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- HFND Dec 24, 2025
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- HFND Dec 26, 2025
- HBDC Monthly
- HFND Annual
Distribution history
HBDC vs HFND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBDC 2.5%HFND 7.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBDC −0.28HFND 0.63
- Worst fall
- HBDC −3.0%HFND −13.3%
- Market sensitivity
- HBDC 0.13HFND 0.51
HBDC and HFND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
