Skip to content

HBDC vs QALT

Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

HBDCANasdaq

SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

QALTANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

HBDC −0.41pt a year

HBDC0.39%QALT0.80%

Avg volume · 30D

QALT 2.3×the volume

HBDC7.84KQALT17.7K

HBDC vs QALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.0%HBDC+6.6%QALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HBDC +2.0%. QALT +6.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%4%8%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HBDC 0.39%, better
QALT 0.80%
Fund size
HBDC $90M
QALT $195M
1Y total return
HBDC +2.0%
QALT +6.6%, better
Yield (12M)
HBDC 5.15%
QALT No data
Holdings
HBDC 156
QALT 26
Avg volume (30D)
HBDC 7.84K sh
QALT 17.7K sh, better
NAV per share
HBDC $24.37
QALT $25.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HBDC: Cost 100, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 86, Durability 49. QALT: Cost 90, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 65.
Pillar letters and Scores for HBDC, QALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHBDCQALT
Cost30% weightA100HigherA90
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB63B65Higher
Tradability15% weightC48B57Higher
Holdings10% weightA86Not scored
Durability5% weightC49B65Higher

Rank among Alternative Strategies funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HBDC and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Alternative Strategies⁠

Category · 29 funds
See all 29 ›

HBDC ranks 2nd and QALT 4th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2AHBDCHilton BDC Corporate Bond ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 2AQAINYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AQALTSEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 5BIALTiShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETFScore 69

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HBDCAHilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

QALTASEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

In short

HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.

QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.

Stated mandate

HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.

QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.

Why people hold it

  • HBDC At 0.39% it undercuts the typical alternatives fund (cohort median near 1.01%) and peers like QAI at 0.75% and FTLS at 0.95%.
  • First fund built only around BDC bonds, and it sits above the equity: senior unsecured debt from issuers required by law to keep 150% asset coverage.hiltoncapitalmanagement.comhiltonetfs.com
  • Plumbing is plain: a Solactive index rebalanced quarterly with credit and liquidity screens, and the fund seeks to pay monthly.hiltonetfs.com
  • QALT Charges 0.80% a year against a 1.07% median for alternatives funds. Multi-manager hedge fund exposure usually bills more than that.
  • Not a one-trick fund. Directional or tactical, event-driven and arbitrage sleeves run side by side through several underlying funds and sub-advisers.
  • The yardstick is 3-month T-bills, the cash hurdle hedge funds get judged on. The stated aim is positive absolute return with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds.
  • Screens near the top of its alternatives peer group, and comes in under pricier multi-strategy options such as HFGM and HDG at 0.95%.

Worth knowing

  • HBDC Non-diversified by design. The BDC bond universe is small, so one issuer's credit trouble carries more weight here than in a broad corporate bond fund.hiltonetfs.com
  • Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mainstream bond ETFs.
  • Launched in 2025, meaning the record is short and has not yet spanned a full credit cycle.
  • QALT Launched in 2025, so there is no long record showing how this manager lineup behaves through a full market cycle.
  • Trading is thin next to big index ETFs, which can mean wider spreads when you get in or out.
  • Not the cheapest seat in the aisle: RNMN (0.59%) and CCEF (0.74%) charge less, though each runs a narrower strategy set than a multi-manager book.

Full HBDC profile⁠

Full QALT profile⁠

HBDC vs QALT Holdings

How HBDC and QALT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of HBDC and 0.0% of QALT.

Level by level

  • Asset classFixed Income, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile71.7%

Sector

No Sector split for HBDC and QALT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HBDC and QALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in HBDCMore in QALT
United StatesHBDC +28.3 points
TaiwanQALT +5.1 points
South KoreaQALT +3.8 points
ChinaQALT +3.4 points
JapanQALT +2.5 points
United KingdomQALT +2.1 points
IndiaQALT +1.9 points
SwitzerlandQALT +1.1 points
Other countries (31)QALT +8.3 points

Outside the US: QALT 39% developed, 61% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HBDC12.1%
  • QALT83.4%

Securities held

  • HBDC155
  • QALT25

Asset class

HBDC
Fixed Income
QALT
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in HBDC155
  • In both0
  • Only in QALT25

Only in HBDC

155 securities, 99.3% of HBDC by weight

  • Ares Capital Corp 2.875% 06/15/20281.35%
  • Blue Owl Capital Corp 5.95% 03/15/20291.28%
  • Apollo Debt Solutions BDC 6.9% 04/13/20291.26%

Only in QALT

25 securities, 28.9% of QALT by weight

  • Coca-Cola Co 0CP 11/20/261.45%
  • Sanofi 0 % Cp 12/14/20261.45%
  • Roche Holdings 0 11/12/261.44%

Weight gaps

HBDC and QALT share no securities.

All HBDC holdings⁠All 41 QALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HBDC vs QALT Cost

Overpaying QALT vs HBDC

$7,448

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HBDC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • QALT 0.80%

    $15,346

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HBDC 0.39%
  • QALT 0.80%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QALT $15,346HBDC $7,898

Year by year

YearHBDCQALTOverpaying
10$705$1,422$717
20$2,725$5,393$2,668
30$7,898$15,346$7,448

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
  • 0.80%QALT
  • Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
  • Median 1.13%

HBDC cheapest of 29 funds

QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds

HBDC vs QALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HBDC 5.15%
QALT No data
Payout (12M)
HBDC $1.25
QALT No data
Last payment
HBDC $0.11
QALT $0.17
Ex-dividend
HBDC Oct 29, 2026
QALT Oct 5, 2026
Paid on
HBDC Oct 30, 2026
QALT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
HBDC Monthly
QALT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HBDCMonthly · 16 paymentsAll HBDC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jul 30, 2025 $0.12; Aug 28, 2025 $0.09; Sep 29, 2025 $0.08; Oct 30, 2025 $0.11; Nov 26, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Jan 29, 2026 $0.08; Feb 26, 2026 $0.10; Mar 30, 2026 $0.11; Apr 29, 2026 $0.11; May 28, 2026 $0.11; Jun 29, 2026 $0.10; Jul 30, 2026 $0.11; Aug 28, 2026 $0.10; Sep 29, 2026 $0.11; Oct 29, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD
QALTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll QALT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2025 $0.62; Dec 29, 2025 $0.66; Apr 6, 2026 $0.15; Jul 6, 2026 $0.15; Oct 5, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502026YTD

HBDC vs QALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HBDC 2.5%since Jul 2025QALT 7.2%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HBDC −0.28since Jul 2025QALT 0.77since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HBDC −3.0%since Jun 2025QALT −4.9%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HBDC 0.13QALT 0.24

HBDC and QALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • HBDCAvsFLSPA

    Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QALTAvsFLSPA

    SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HBDCAvsQAIA

    Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF · NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QALTAvsQAIA

    SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HBDCAvsIALTB

    Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF · iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QALTAvsIALTB

    SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.