QAI ranks 2nd and QALT 4th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
QAI vs QALT
QALT −0.01pt a year
0.81%0.80%
QAI 3.2×the volume
56.1K17.7K
QAI vs QALT Performance
+6.4%+6.6%
- QAI 0.81%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- QAI $999M
- QALT $195M
- QAI +6.4%
- QALT +6.6%, better
- QAI 1.42%
- QALT
- QAI 55
- QALT 26
- QAI 56.1K sh, better
- QALT 17.7K sh
- QAI $35.49
- QALT $25.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QAI | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | C50 | |
| Durability | A84Higher | B65 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. QAI and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QAIA
QALTA
In short
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QAI vs QALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QAI vs QALT Cost
Overpaying QAI vs QALT
$172
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QAI | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,439 | $1,422 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,456 | $5,393 | $63 |
| 30 | $15,518 | $15,346 | $172 |
- 0.81%QAI
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
QAI vs QALT Dividends
- QAI 1.42%
- QALT
- QAI $0.50
- QALT
- QAI $0.50
- QALT $0.17
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- QAI Annual
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
QAI vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QAI 5.2%QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- QAI 0.81QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- QAI −14.1%QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- QAI 0.35QALT 0.24
QAI and QALT in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.