SPDW ranks 2nd and HEFA 19th of 20 funds in the Developed International Core Category.
HEFA vs SPDW
SPDW −0.67pt a year
0.70%0.03%
SPDW 4.8×the volume
581K2.8M
HEFA +2.3pt
+12.1%+9.8%
HEFA vs SPDW Performance
+86.9%+54.5%
- HEFA 0.70%
- SPDW 0.03%, better
- HEFA $7.54B
- SPDW $41.4B
- HEFA +17.9%, better
- SPDW +17.0%
- HEFA 4.04%, better
- SPDW 3.07%
- HEFA 677
- SPDW 2444
- HEFA 581K sh
- SPDW 2.8M sh, better
- HEFA $46.32
- SPDW $49.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HEFA | SPDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B68Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | B68 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B58 | A76Higher |
Rank among Developed International Core funds
Same Category. HEFA and SPDW are both graded against the same 20 Developed International Core funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HEFAD
SPDWA
In short
HEFA Developed-market stocks from Europe, Japan and Australia with the currency swings stripped out. iShares' long-running hedged EAFE fund owns the same companies as the standard index, then neutralizes most of the yen, euro and pound moves.
SPDW Developed markets outside the US, roughly 2,400 stocks deep, for three basis points. State Street's 2007-vintage international core: priced at the category floor and built wide rather than mega-cap-only.
Stated mandate
HEFA The fund seeks to track an index of international equities in developed markets while reducing the effect of currency fluctuations.
SPDW The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HEFA vs SPDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HEFA vs SPDW Cost
Overpaying HEFA vs SPDW
$12,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HEFA 0.70%
$13,606
SPDW 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HEFA | SPDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $55 | $1,195 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $216 | $4,544 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $638 | $12,968 |
- 0.70%HEFA
- 0.03%SPDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Core funds
- Median 0.10%
SPDW cheapest of 20 funds
HEFA 20th cheapest of 20 funds
HEFA vs SPDW Dividends
- HEFA 4.04%, better
- SPDW 3.07%
- HEFA $1.87
- SPDW $1.52
- HEFA $0.69
- SPDW $0.72
- HEFA Jul 2, 2026
- SPDW Jun 22, 2026
- HEFA Jul 8, 2026
- SPDW Jun 26, 2026
- HEFA Twice a year
- SPDW Twice a year
Distribution history
HEFA vs SPDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HEFA
- SPDW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HEFA 8.4%, betterSPDW 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- HEFA 1.73, betterSPDW 1.27
- Worst fall
- HEFA −14.8%, betterSPDW −29.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HEFA 0.51SPDW 1.03
HEFA and SPDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

