QAI ranks 3rd and HFGM 18th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HFGM vs QAI
QAI −0.20pt a year
1.01%0.81%
QAI 1.3×the volume
44.9K58.2K
HFGM vs QAI Performance
+1.4%+7.5%
- HFGM 1.01%
- QAI 0.81%, better
- HFGM $135M
- QAI $985M
- HFGM +1.4%
- QAI +7.5%, better
- HFGM
- QAI 1.41%
- HFGM 23
- QAI 66
- HFGM 44.9K sh
- QAI 58.2K sh, better
- HFGM $28.21
- QAI $35.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HFGM | QAI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F14 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | |
| Durability | C52 | A84Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HFGM and QAI are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HFGMC
QAIA
In short
HFGM Most macro funds pick their own trades. HFGM reverse-engineers what global macro hedge funds are already positioned in, then runs that book at roughly twice the sector's volatility. Replication, with the dial turned up.
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
Stated mandate
HFGM The Fund seeks capital appreciation by using a proprietary algorithm to build long and short positions in broad-based ETFs and futures, seeking to match recent gross returns of hedge funds’ Global Macro sector while targeting approximately twice its volatility.
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HFGM vs QAI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HFGM vs QAI Cost
Overpaying HFGM vs QAI
$3,332
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HFGM 1.01%
$18,850
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HFGM | QAI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,439 | $341 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $5,456 | $1,230 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $15,518 | $3,332 |
- 1.01%HFGM
- 0.81%QAI, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
HFGM 12th cheapest of 29 funds
HFGM vs QAI Dividends
- HFGM
- QAI 1.41%
- HFGM
- QAI $0.50
- HFGM $3.24
- QAI $0.50
- HFGM Dec 24, 2025
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- HFGM Dec 26, 2025
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- HFGM Irregular
- QAI Annual
Distribution history
HFGM vs QAI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HFGM 16.9%QAI 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- HFGM 0.88QAI 0.81
- Worst fall
- HFGM −21.2%QAI −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- HFGM 0.72QAI 0.36
HFGM and QAI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

