WTMF ranks 2nd and HFMF 11th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
HFMF vs WTMF
WTMF −0.31pt a year
0.97%0.66%
WTMF 3.0×the volume
11.6K35.5K
HFMF vs WTMF Performance
+9.3%+13.5%
- HFMF 0.97%
- WTMF 0.66%, better
- HFMF $24M
- WTMF $264M
- HFMF +9.3%
- WTMF +13.5%, better
- HFMF
- WTMF 7.87%
- HFMF 12
- WTMF 27
- HFMF 11.6K sh
- WTMF 35.5K sh, better
- HFMF $22.76
- WTMF $39.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HFMF | WTMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F19 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | D36 | |
| Durability | D35 | A80Higher |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. HFMF and WTMF are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HFMFD
WTMFA
In short
HFMF Peers build their own trend models. HFMF reverse-engineers the crowd instead: machine learning reads the managed futures hedge fund sector's returns and rebuilds them with futures and broad ETFs, at roughly twice the sector's volatility.
WTMF A managed futures veteran. Trading since 2011, WTMF takes rules-based long and short positions across commodity, currency, equity and rate futures, aiming for returns with limited direct link to stocks or bonds.
Stated mandate
HFMF The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It seeks managed-futures-like return characteristics through long and short positions in broad-based ETFs and futures contracts, with at least 80% of assets allocated to that strategy.
WTMF The Fund seeks positive total returns in rising or falling markets with limited direct correlation to broad equity or fixed-income returns. It uses a quantitative, rules-based approach with long and short futures positions across commodity, currency, equity, and interest-rate markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HFMF vs WTMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HFMF vs WTMF Cost
Overpaying HFMF vs WTMF
$5,302
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HFMF 0.97%
$18,198
WTMF 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HFMF | WTMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,180 | $532 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $4,504 | $1,939 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $12,896 | $5,302 |
- 0.97%HFMF
- 0.66%WTMF, cheaper
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
WTMF 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
HFMF 10th cheapest of 14 funds
HFMF vs WTMF Dividends
- HFMF
- WTMF 7.87%
- HFMF
- WTMF $3.14
- HFMF $0.62
- WTMF $2.81
- HFMF Dec 24, 2025
- WTMF Oct 27, 2026
- HFMF Dec 26, 2025
- WTMF Oct 29, 2026
- HFMF Irregular
- WTMF Annual
Distribution history
HFMF vs WTMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HFMF 11.3%WTMF 6.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- HFMF 0.76WTMF 0.98
- Worst fall
- HFMF −15.2%WTMF −13.2%
- Market sensitivity
- HFMF −0.01WTMF 0.29
HFMF and WTMF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



