Skip to content
etf.net

HIMC vs PANG

Corgi HIMS 2x Daily ETF

HIMCCCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

PANGANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

HIMC −0.31pt a year

HIMC0.45%PANG0.76%

Avg volume · 30D

PANG 41.8×the volume

HIMC1.04KPANG43.3K

HIMC vs PANG Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−51.9%HIMC−34.8%PANG

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. HIMC −51.9%. PANG −34.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
HIMC 0.45%, better
PANG 0.76%
Fund size
HIMC $0
PANG $8M
1Y total return
HIMC No data
PANG +48.4%
Holdings
HIMC 1
PANG 4
Avg volume (30D)
HIMC 1.04K sh
PANG 43.3K sh, better
NAV per share
HIMC $11.62
PANG $28.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HIMC: Cost 88, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 17, Holdings not scored, Durability 17. PANG: Cost 70, Risk 75, Mission 94, Tradability 73, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for HIMC, PANG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHIMCPANG
Cost30% weightA88HigherA70
Mission25% weightNot scoredA94
Risk15% weightC49A75Higher
Tradability15% weightF17A73Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF17B57Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HIMC and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

PANG ranks 3rd and HIMC 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3APANGLeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BAMDGLeverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 123CGRAGLeverage Shares 2x Long GRAB Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 123CHIMCCorgi HIMS 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 123DHIMZDaily Target 2X Long HIMS ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HIMCCCorgi HIMS 2x Daily ETF

PANGALeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

In short

HIMC No data

PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

HIMC No data

PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.

Why people hold it

HIMC No data

  • PANG Cheaper of the two 2x PANW funds: 0.76% flat versus 1.08% for PALU, and PALU's number is net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (1.48% gross).direxion.com
  • That 0.76% also sits below the typical fee in the single-stock leveraged category, where costs usually run higher.
  • Hits its 200% daily target closely, one of the tighter implementations among hundreds of single-stock leveraged funds.
  • Leverage arrives inside a standard 1940 Act ETF: no margin agreement, no borrowing, no overnight position to roll yourself.leverageshares.com

Worth knowing

HIMC No data

  • PANG Daily reset, not a 2x hold. Over weeks the returns compound, and a choppy stretch in PANW can leave the result far from double the move.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, twice the swing. An earnings miss or a cyber headline lands here with double the force, up or down.leverageshares.com
  • Smaller and more lightly traded than the giants of the category, so spreads can widen; limit orders earn their keep.

Full HIMC profile⁠

Full PANG profile⁠

HIMC vs PANG Holdings

How HIMC and PANG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: HIMC gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

PANG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for HIMC and PANG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HIMC and PANG, widest gap first
CountryMore in HIMCMore in PANGGap
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HIMC200.8%
  • PANG209.1%

Securities held

  • HIMC0
  • PANG1

Asset class

HIMC
Stocks
PANG
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in HIMC0
  • In both0
  • Only in PANG1

Only in HIMC

0 securities, 0.0% of HIMC by weight

Only in PANG

1 security, 9.1% of PANG by weight

  • First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20409.10%

Weight gaps

HIMC and PANG share no securities.

All 1 HIMC holdings⁠All 4 PANG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HIMC vs PANG Cost

Overpaying PANG vs HIMC

$5,615

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HIMC 0.45%

    $9,041

  • PANG 0.76%

    $14,656

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HIMC 0.45%
  • PANG 0.76%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PANG $14,656HIMC $9,041

Year by year

YearHIMCPANGOverpaying
10$812$1,353$541
20$3,128$5,142$2,014
30$9,041$14,656$5,615

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%HIMC, cheaper
  • 0.76%PANG
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

HIMC 7th cheapest of 315 funds

PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds

HIMC vs PANG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
HIMC None
PANG No data
Last payment
HIMC No data
PANG $1.30
Ex-dividend
HIMC No data
PANG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
HIMC No data
PANG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
HIMC No data
PANG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HIMCAll HIMC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PANGIrregular · 1 paymentAll PANG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

HIMC vs PANG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HIMC No dataPANG 128.2%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HIMC No dataPANG 0.90since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HIMC No dataPANG −62.4%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HIMC 0.00PANG 3.57

Popular comparisons

  • HIMCCvsTSMGA

    Corgi HIMS 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HIMCCvsUNHGA

    Corgi HIMS 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HIMCCvsAMDGB

    Corgi HIMS 2x Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsAMDGB

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.