PANG ranks 3rd and HIMZ 249th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
HIMZ vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.57pt a year
1.33%0.76%
HIMZ 7.9×the volume
353K44.6K
HIMZ vs PANG Performance
−87.4%+91.6%
- HIMZ 1.33%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- HIMZ $52M
- PANG $9M
- HIMZ −87.4%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- HIMZ 10
- PANG 4
- HIMZ 353K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- HIMZ $22.37
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HIMZ | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A94 |
| Risk | D35 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B69 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. HIMZ and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HIMZD
PANGA
In short
HIMZ Two times the daily move in Hims & Hers, wrapped in one ticker. Defiance builds it with swaps and options and resets it every day, so it's a one-session tool, and the 1.33% fee (no waiver) sits above the single-stock leverage crowd.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
HIMZ The Fund seeks 2x the daily percentage change in Hims & Hers Health Inc.'s share price before fees and expenses. It uses swaps and/or listed options and targets this result only for a single trading day.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HIMZ vs PANG Holdings
How HIMZ and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of HIMZ and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in HIMZMore in PANG | HIMZ | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- HIMZ283.9%
- PANG208.4%
- HIMZ3
- PANG1
Asset class
- HIMZ
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in HIMZ3
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in HIMZ
3 securities, 100% of HIMZ by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202681.33%
- Hims & Hers Health Inc Com? Cs32.91%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20312.22%
Only in PANG
1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%
Weight gaps
HIMZ and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HIMZ vs PANG Cost
Overpaying HIMZ vs PANG
$9,161
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HIMZ 1.33%
$23,817
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HIMZ | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,313 | $1,353 | $960 |
| 20 | $8,564 | $5,142 | $3,422 |
| 30 | $23,817 | $14,656 | $9,161 |
- 1.33%HIMZ
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
HIMZ 248th cheapest of 315 funds
HIMZ vs PANG Dividends
- HIMZ $1.97
- PANG $1.30
- HIMZ Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- HIMZ Dec 31, 2025
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- HIMZ Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
HIMZ vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HIMZ 208.0%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- HIMZ 0.24PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- HIMZ −98.2%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HIMZ 4.11PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.33% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.33% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.33% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.