USCL ranks 8th and HLAL 36th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
HLAL vs USCL
USCL −0.42pt a year
0.50%0.08%
HLAL 4.3×the volume
56K13.1K
HLAL +0.3pt
+21.8%+21.5%
HLAL vs USCL Performance
+17.0%+7.3%
- HLAL 0.50%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- HLAL $972M
- USCL $2.77B
- HLAL +17.0%, better
- USCL +7.3%
- HLAL 0.38%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- HLAL 200
- USCL 394
- HLAL 56K sh, better
- USCL 13.1K sh
- HLAL $73.39
- USCL $85.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HLAL | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | D38 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | F22 | D36Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A70Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. HLAL and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HLALC
USCLA
In short
HLAL The original US-listed halal equity ETF: roughly 220 large and mid-cap American stocks that clear FTSE's Shariah business and balance-sheet screens, with a per-share purification figure published every quarter.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
HLAL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the FTSE USA Shariah Index.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HLAL vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HLAL vs USCL Cost
Overpaying HLAL vs USCL
$8,290
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HLAL 0.50%
$9,979
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HLAL | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $147 | $753 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $575 | $2,885 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,689 | $8,290 |
- 0.50%HLAL
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
HLAL 40th cheapest of 47 funds
HLAL vs USCL Dividends
- HLAL 0.38%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- HLAL $0.27
- USCL $0.91
- HLAL $0.10
- USCL $0.20
- HLAL Sep 24, 2026
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- HLAL Sep 25, 2026
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- HLAL Quarterly
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
HLAL vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HLAL 14.6%USCL 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HLAL 1.13USCL 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- HLAL −23.2%USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- HLAL 1.03USCL 1.01
HLAL and USCL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
