Skip to content

HOLD vs JPFP

Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)

HOLDCNYSE Arca

JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF

JPFPBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

JPFP −0.11pt a year

HOLD0.70%JPFP0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

JPFP 3.2×the volume

HOLD1.93KJPFP6.22K

HOLD vs JPFP Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−2.4%HOLD+0.5%JPFP

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. HOLD −2.4%. JPFP +0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HOLD 0.70%
JPFP 0.59%, better
Fund size
HOLD $4M
JPFP $122M
1Y total return
HOLD +1.3%
JPFP No data
Holdings
HOLD 10
JPFP 471
Avg volume (30D)
HOLD 1.93K sh
JPFP 6.22K sh, better
NAV per share
HOLD $31.38
JPFP $49.66
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HOLD: Cost 80, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 30, Durability 35. JPFP: Cost 100, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 25, Holdings not scored, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for HOLD, JPFP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHOLDJPFP
Cost30% weightA80A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD26D37Higher
Tradability15% weightD32HigherD25
Holdings10% weightD30Not scored
Durability5% weightD35C45Higher

Rank among Managed Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HOLD and JPFP are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Futures⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

JPFP ranks 4th and HOLD 10th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.

  1. Rank 4BFFUTFidelity Managed Futures ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 4BJPFPJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 6BDBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 8CKMLMKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 10CHOLDHarbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)Score 40
  6. Rank 11DHFMFUnlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETFScore 28

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HOLDCHarbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)

JPFPBJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF

In short

HOLD Own the S&P 500 and rent a trend-follower in one ticker. Harbor's 2025 launch layers an active, quantitative managed futures sleeve on top of passive index replication, so the diversifier rides along instead of taking the equity seat.

JPFP Most managed futures ETFs make you sell stocks to make room. JPFP stacks instead: full large-cap U.S. equity exposure plus an active long/short trend program across global equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, for 0.59%.

Stated mandate

HOLD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a passive strategy intended to replicate the S&P 500 Index combined with an active, quantitative trend-following managed futures strategy.

JPFP The fund seeks capital appreciation by combining an active managed futures strategy with a U.S. large-cap equity strategy in one investment. The managed-futures component uses derivatives for long or short exposure across global equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.

Why people hold it

  • HOLD Two jobs, one line item: passive S&P 500 replication plus an active trend-following managed futures strategy, stacked rather than swapped.
  • The 0.70% fee sits below the typical allocation-fund charge, which is unusual for a wrapper carrying an active futures overlay.
  • The trend sleeve casts a global net across markets, and the whole thing sits in a plain 1940 Act ETF: daily pricing, no K-1 partnership paperwork.
  • JPFP Stacked, not swapped. Derivatives let the fund carry broad large-cap U.S. equity exposure while the managed futures sleeve runs alongside it in the same wrapper.jpmorgan.com
  • At 0.59% it comes in below the typical managed futures ETF fee and under the top-scoring names in the group, including WTMF at 0.65% and DBMF at 0.85%.
  • The trend sleeve can go long or short global equities, fixed income, currencies and commodities, so it is not locked to the direction of any single market.jpmorgan.com
  • Built by J.P. Morgan's Multi-Asset Solutions team, which ran this stacking approach in its own portfolios before putting it in an ETF. One of the stronger builds in a crowded niche.jpmorgan.com

Worth knowing

  • HOLD Opened in 2025, so live history is thin. The futures sleeve is discretionary quant, not an index, so outcomes trace the manager's models.
  • Small and lightly traded so far, which tends to mean wider spreads than the household names in the allocation aisle.
  • The stacking shelf is competitive: NTSX and GDE run similar stock-plus-diversifier ideas for under a third of the cost, with years of record behind them.
  • JPFP The live record starts at the 2026 launch, and the fund is still building assets and volume, so spreads can run wider than at the category's biggest names.
  • Both engines use derivatives, and both can go against you at once. Trend models are designed to follow moves, so sharp reversals can whipsaw the futures sleeve.jpmorgan.com
  • Fully active with proprietary models and no benchmark index to check it against, so outcomes ride on the manager's signals rather than a published rulebook.jpmorgan.com

Full HOLD profile⁠

Full JPFP profile⁠

HOLD vs JPFP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HOLD vs JPFP Cost

Overpaying HOLD vs JPFP

$1,971

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HOLD 0.70%

    $13,606

  • JPFP 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HOLD 0.70%
  • JPFP 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530HOLD $13,606JPFP $11,635

Year by year

YearHOLDJPFPOverpaying
10$1,250$1,058$192
20$4,760$4,051$709
30$13,606$11,635$1,971

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%HOLD
  • 0.59%JPFP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Managed Futures funds
  • Median 0.85%

JPFP cheapest of 14 funds

HOLD 4th cheapest of 14 funds

HOLD vs JPFP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
HOLD No data
JPFP None
Last payment
HOLD $2.23
JPFP No data
Ex-dividend
HOLD Dec 19, 2025
JPFP No data
Paid on
HOLD Dec 24, 2025
JPFP No data
Frequency
HOLD Irregular
JPFP No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HOLDIrregular · 1 paymentAll HOLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $2.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502026YTD
JPFPAll JPFP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

HOLD vs JPFP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HOLD 15.3%since Sep 2025JPFP No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HOLD 0.39since Sep 2025JPFP No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HOLD −9.6%since Aug 2025JPFP No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HOLD 0.98JPFP 1.19

HOLD and JPFP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • HOLDCvsIMFA

    Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsIMFA

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOLDCvsWTMFA

    Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsWTMFA

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOLDCvsISMFB

    Harbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD) · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsISMFB

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.