JPFP ranks 4th and HOLD 10th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
HOLD vs JPFP
JPFP −0.11pt a year
0.70%0.59%
JPFP 3.2×the volume
1.93K6.22K
HOLD vs JPFP Performance
−2.4%+0.5%
- HOLD 0.70%
- JPFP 0.59%, better
- HOLD $4M
- JPFP $122M
- HOLD +1.3%
- JPFP
- HOLD 10
- JPFP 471
- HOLD 1.93K sh
- JPFP 6.22K sh, better
- HOLD $31.38
- JPFP $49.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HOLD | JPFP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D26 | D37Higher |
| Tradability | D32Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | D30 | |
| Durability | D35 | C45Higher |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. HOLD and JPFP are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HOLDC
JPFPB
In short
HOLD Own the S&P 500 and rent a trend-follower in one ticker. Harbor's 2025 launch layers an active, quantitative managed futures sleeve on top of passive index replication, so the diversifier rides along instead of taking the equity seat.
JPFP Most managed futures ETFs make you sell stocks to make room. JPFP stacks instead: full large-cap U.S. equity exposure plus an active long/short trend program across global equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, for 0.59%.
Stated mandate
HOLD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a passive strategy intended to replicate the S&P 500 Index combined with an active, quantitative trend-following managed futures strategy.
JPFP The fund seeks capital appreciation by combining an active managed futures strategy with a U.S. large-cap equity strategy in one investment. The managed-futures component uses derivatives for long or short exposure across global equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HOLD vs JPFP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HOLD vs JPFP Cost
Overpaying HOLD vs JPFP
$1,971
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HOLD 0.70%
$13,606
JPFP 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HOLD | JPFP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,058 | $192 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $4,051 | $709 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $11,635 | $1,971 |
- 0.70%HOLD
- 0.59%JPFP, cheaper
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
JPFP cheapest of 14 funds
HOLD 4th cheapest of 14 funds
HOLD vs JPFP Dividends
- HOLD
- JPFP None
- HOLD $2.23
- JPFP
- HOLD Dec 19, 2025
- JPFP
- HOLD Dec 24, 2025
- JPFP
- HOLD Irregular
- JPFP
Distribution history
HOLD vs JPFP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HOLD 15.3%JPFP
- Return per unit of risk
- HOLD 0.39JPFP
- Worst fall
- HOLD −9.6%JPFP
- Market sensitivity
- HOLD 0.98JPFP 1.19
HOLD and JPFP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

