UNHG ranks 2nd and HOOG 54th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
HOOG vs UNHG
3.2%by weight
UNHG −0.08pt a year
0.85%0.77%
UNHG 1.8×the volume
409K726K
HOOG vs UNHG Performance
−83.0%+11.9%
- HOOG 0.85%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- HOOG $30M
- UNHG $63M
- HOOG −83.0%
- UNHG +11.9%, better
- HOOG 6
- UNHG 5
- HOOG 409K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- HOOG $17.57
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HOOG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A90 |
| Risk | D37 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A82 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66 | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. HOOG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HOOGB
UNHGA
In short
HOOG Two-for-one on the brokerage retail traders live in: HOOG aims to deliver twice Robinhood stock's daily move, reset every day, for 0.85% with no fee waiver. The issuer built it for single-day holds.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
HOOG The fund seeks to deliver twice the daily performance of Robinhood Markets stock, before fees and expenses. It is intended for short-term, actively monitored leveraged exposure and rebalances daily.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HOOG vs UNHG Holdings
How HOOG and UNHG differ
3.2%
Shared holdings make up 12.0% of UNHG and 3.2% of HOOG.
Level by level
- Holdings3.2%
Sector
No Sector split for HOOG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in HOOGMore in UNHG | HOOG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- HOOG203.2%
- UNHG212.0%
- HOOG2
- UNHG1
Asset class
- HOOG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in HOOG1
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in HOOG
1 security, 61.5% of HOOG by weight
- Robinhood Mkts Inc - L - Marex61.48%
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in HOOGMore in UNHG | HOOG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | UNHG +8.76 points | 3.23% | 11.99% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HOOG vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying HOOG vs UNHG
$1,370
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HOOG 0.85%
$16,199
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HOOG | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,371 | $137 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,205 | $501 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,829 | $1,370 |
- 0.85%HOOG
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
HOOG 150th cheapest of 315 funds
HOOG vs UNHG Dividends
- HOOG $6.69
- UNHG $1.90
- HOOG Dec 30, 2025
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- HOOG Jan 2, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- HOOG Irregular
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
HOOG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HOOG 146.3%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- HOOG 0.75UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- HOOG −86.9%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- HOOG 6.58UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.