PANG ranks 3rd and HOOG 54th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
HOOG vs PANG
PANG −0.09pt a year
0.85%0.76%
HOOG 9.2×the volume
409K44.6K
HOOG vs PANG Performance
−83.0%+91.6%
- HOOG 0.85%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- HOOG $30M
- PANG $9M
- HOOG −83.0%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- HOOG 6
- PANG 4
- HOOG 409K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- HOOG $17.57
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HOOG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A94 |
| Risk | D37 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. HOOG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HOOGB
PANGA
In short
HOOG Two-for-one on the brokerage retail traders live in: HOOG aims to deliver twice Robinhood stock's daily move, reset every day, for 0.85% with no fee waiver. The issuer built it for single-day holds.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
HOOG The fund seeks to deliver twice the daily performance of Robinhood Markets stock, before fees and expenses. It is intended for short-term, actively monitored leveraged exposure and rebalances daily.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HOOG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HOOG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying HOOG vs PANG
$1,543
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HOOG 0.85%
$16,199
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HOOG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,353 | $155 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,142 | $564 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,656 | $1,543 |
- 0.85%HOOG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
HOOG 150th cheapest of 315 funds
HOOG vs PANG Dividends
- HOOG $6.69
- PANG $1.30
- HOOG Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- HOOG Jan 2, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- HOOG Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
HOOG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HOOG 146.3%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- HOOG 0.75PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- HOOG −86.9%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HOOG 6.58PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.