MSFW ranks 3rd and HOOW 14th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
HOOW vs MSFW
HOOW −0.01pt a year
0.99%1.00%
HOOW 16.6×the volume
214K12.9K
HOOW vs MSFW Performance
−53.4%−2.8%
- HOOW 0.99%, better
- MSFW 1.00%
- HOOW $112M
- MSFW $29M
- HOOW −53.4%
- MSFW −2.8%, better
- HOOW 125.52%, better
- MSFW 30.11%
- HOOW 4
- MSFW 4
- HOOW 214K sh, better
- MSFW 12.9K sh
- HOOW $18.28
- MSFW $32.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HOOW | MSFW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | C43 | A93Higher |
| Risk | F18 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | D36 | A79Higher |
| Durability | A80Higher | C50 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. HOOW and MSFW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HOOWC
MSFWB
In short
HOOW Most single-stock leverage funds swing 2x and reset every day. HOOW dials it to 1.2x on Robinhood shares, resets by the calendar week, and is built to pay out along the way.
MSFW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily at 2x. MSFW dials it down: 1.2 times Microsoft's calendar-week total return, a payout every week, 1.00% with no fee waiver.
Stated mandate
HOOW The fund seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns equal to 1.2 times the weekly total return of Robinhood Markets common shares, before fees and expenses.
MSFW MSFW seeks to provide weekly distributions and calendar-week returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Microsoft common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HOOW vs MSFW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HOOW vs MSFW Cost
Overpaying MSFW vs HOOW
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HOOW 0.99%
$18,525
MSFW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HOOW | MSFW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,763 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $6,625 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $18,688 | $163 |
- 0.99%HOOW, cheaper
- 1.00%MSFW
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
HOOW 3rd cheapest of 17 funds
MSFW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
HOOW vs MSFW Dividends
- HOOW 125.52%, better
- MSFW 30.11%
- HOOW $22.96
- MSFW $9.79
- HOOW $0.17
- MSFW $0.17
- HOOW Oct 26, 2026
- MSFW Oct 26, 2026
- HOOW Oct 27, 2026
- MSFW Oct 27, 2026
- HOOW Weekly
- MSFW Weekly
Distribution history
HOOW vs MSFW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HOOW 73.6%MSFW 42.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- HOOW 0.01MSFW −0.03
- Worst fall
- HOOW −65.8%MSFW −41.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HOOW 2.72MSFW 1.48
HOOW and MSFW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
