AAPW ranks 1st and MSFW 3rd of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs MSFW
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
1.00%1.00%
AAPW 1.1×the volume
14K12.9K
AAPW vs MSFW Performance
+28.3%−2.8%
- AAPW 1.00%
- MSFW 1.00%
- AAPW $44M
- MSFW $29M
- AAPW +28.3%, better
- MSFW −2.8%
- AAPW 26.59%
- MSFW 30.11%, better
- AAPW 5
- MSFW 4
- AAPW 14K sh, better
- MSFW 12.9K sh
- AAPW $41.43
- MSFW $32.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | MSFW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A88 | A93Higher |
| Risk | A84Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | C45 | A79Higher |
| Durability | B66Higher | C50 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and MSFW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
MSFWB
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
MSFW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily at 2x. MSFW dials it down: 1.2 times Microsoft's calendar-week total return, a payout every week, 1.00% with no fee waiver.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
MSFW MSFW seeks to provide weekly distributions and calendar-week returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Microsoft common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs MSFW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs MSFW Cost
Same expense ratio
$18,688
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
MSFW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | MSFW |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,763 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,625 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,688 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 1.00%MSFW
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
MSFW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs MSFW Dividends
- AAPW 26.59%
- MSFW 30.11%, better
- AAPW $11.02
- MSFW $9.79
- AAPW $0.24
- MSFW $0.17
- AAPW Oct 26, 2026
- MSFW Oct 26, 2026
- AAPW Oct 27, 2026
- MSFW Oct 27, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- MSFW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs MSFW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%MSFW 42.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76MSFW −0.03
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%MSFW −41.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 1.02MSFW 1.48
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.