PEPS ranks 21st and HRSK 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
HRSK vs PEPS
PEPS −0.85pt a year
0.95%0.10%
HRSK 14.5×the volume
6.06K417
HRSK vs PEPS Performance
−4.1%−1.2%
- HRSK 0.95%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- HRSK $33M
- PEPS $28M
- HRSK
- PEPS +13.2%
- HRSK
- PEPS 0.98%
- HRSK 120
- PEPS 192
- HRSK 6.06K sh, better
- PEPS 417 sh
- HRSK $24.38
- PEPS $31.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HRSK | PEPS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | F12 | D33Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A71Higher |
| Durability | D26 | D39Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. HRSK and PEPS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HRSKF
PEPSB
In short
HRSK Most S&P 500 options funds sell away upside for premium. HRSK buys protection instead: long-dated puts on its large-cap sleeve, shorter-dated calls to help pay for them, and no stated cap on gains.
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
Stated mandate
HRSK The Fund seeks large-cap U.S. equity exposure while limiting adverse market risk through long-dated put options and using shorter-dated call options as part of its strategy.
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HRSK vs PEPS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HRSK vs PEPS Cost
Overpaying HRSK vs PEPS
$15,763
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HRSK 0.95%
$17,869
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HRSK | PEPS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $183 | $1,495 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $717 | $5,605 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $2,106 | $15,763 |
- 0.95%HRSK
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
HRSK 43rd cheapest of 51 funds
HRSK vs PEPS Dividends
- HRSK
- PEPS 0.98%
- HRSK None
- PEPS $0.32
- HRSK
- PEPS $0.09
- HRSK
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- HRSK
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- HRSK
- PEPS Quarterly
Distribution history
HRSK vs PEPS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HRSK PEPS 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- HRSK PEPS 0.85
- Worst fall
- HRSK PEPS −21.3%
- Market sensitivity
- HRSK 1.03PEPS 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.