Skip to content

HRSK vs PEPS

Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF

HRSKFNYSE Arca

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

PEPSBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

PEPS −0.85pt a year

HRSK0.95%PEPS0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

HRSK 14.5×the volume

HRSK6.06KPEPS417

HRSK vs PEPS Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−4.1%HRSK−1.2%PEPS

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. HRSK −4.1%. PEPS −1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−6%0%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
HRSK 0.95%
PEPS 0.10%, better
Fund size
HRSK $33M
PEPS $28M
1Y total return
HRSK No data
PEPS +13.2%
Yield (12M)
HRSK No data
PEPS 0.98%
Holdings
HRSK 120
PEPS 192
Avg volume (30D)
HRSK 6.06K sh, better
PEPS 417 sh
NAV per share
HRSK $24.38
PEPS $31.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HRSK: Cost 14, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings 46, Durability 26. PEPS: Cost 100, Risk 25, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 71, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for HRSK, PEPS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHRSKPEPS
Cost30% weightF14A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37HigherD25
Tradability15% weightF12D33Higher
Holdings10% weightC46A71Higher
Durability5% weightD26D39Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HRSK and PEPS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Option Income⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PEPS ranks 21st and HRSK 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 20BBNDINeos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 21BPEPSParametric Equity Plus ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 21BTSPYTappAlpha SPY Growth & Daily Income ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 49DYSPYGraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETFScore 28
  5. Rank 50FHRSKToews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETFScore 23
  6. Rank 50FMRSKToews Agility Shares Managed Risk ETFScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HRSKFToews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF

PEPSBParametric Equity Plus ETF

In short

HRSK Most S&P 500 options funds sell away upside for premium. HRSK buys protection instead: long-dated puts on its large-cap sleeve, shorter-dated calls to help pay for them, and no stated cap on gains.

PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.

Stated mandate

HRSK The Fund seeks large-cap U.S. equity exposure while limiting adverse market risk through long-dated put options and using shorter-dated call options as part of its strategy.

PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.

Why people hold it

  • HRSK The contrarian build in a crowd of premium sellers: it holds large-cap US equity, buys long-dated put options to limit downside, and writes shorter-dated calls as part of the strategy.prnewswire.com
  • No stated performance cap, so the equity side isn't structurally boxed in on the upside the way covered-call and buffer payoffs are.prnewswire.com
  • Launched in 2026 via a Section 351 exchange, which let eligible investors move appreciated holdings in tax deferred and keep their original cost basis.prnewswire.com
  • Toews has run managed-risk strategies since 1994, so the hedging playbook here is older than the ETF wrapper around it.prnewswire.com
  • PEPS 0.10% is index-fund pricing for an actively managed strategy. Even the cheap, well-regarded active peers cost more: DFAU at 0.12%, FELC at 0.18%.
  • Not a covered-call fund. The sold S&P 500 calls are paired with offsetting long exposure, so the overlay seeks incremental total return instead of capping upside.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF wrapper, U.S. large-cap equity, distributions paid quarterly. The complexity lives in the overlay, not the tax paperwork.
  • Cost is the standout: the typical active U.S. equity ETF in this group charges several times what PEPS does, and fee drag is the one input you know in advance.

Worth knowing

  • HRSK At 0.95% a year it runs above the 0.60% median for S&P 500 options funds, and rivals like IVVW (0.25%) and GPIX (0.35%) charge a fraction of it.
  • Small asset base and light trading, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the category heavyweights'.
  • Protection isn't free: put premiums come out of returns in calm markets, and the 2026 launch leaves a short record of how the overlay acts in a deep selloff.
  • PEPS Launched in November 2024. The overlay has not yet run through a full market cycle, so there is limited history to judge it on.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than a mega-cap index ETF's, which shows up most on larger orders.
  • The options leg adds moving parts: short index calls lose value in a sharp rally, and the offsetting long exposure is what has to make that back.

Full HRSK profile⁠

Full PEPS profile⁠

HRSK vs PEPS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HRSK vs PEPS Cost

Overpaying HRSK vs PEPS

$15,763

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HRSK 0.95%

    $17,869

  • PEPS 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HRSK 0.95%
  • PEPS 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HRSK $17,869PEPS $2,106

Year by year

YearHRSKPEPSOverpaying
10$1,678$183$1,495
20$6,322$717$5,605
30$17,869$2,106$15,763

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%HRSK
  • 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

PEPS cheapest of 51 funds

HRSK 43rd cheapest of 51 funds

HRSK vs PEPS Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
HRSK No data
PEPS 0.98%
Payout (12M)
HRSK None
PEPS $0.32
Last payment
HRSK No data
PEPS $0.09
Ex-dividend
HRSK No data
PEPS Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
HRSK No data
PEPS Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
HRSK No data
PEPS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

HRSKAll HRSK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PEPSQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll PEPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.06; Sep 22, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

HRSK vs PEPS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HRSK No dataPEPS 12.9%since Dec 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HRSK No dataPEPS 0.85since Dec 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HRSK No dataPEPS −21.3%since Nov 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HRSK 1.03PEPS 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • HRSKFvsBALIA

    Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsBALIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HRSKFvsCSHIA

    Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsCSHIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HRSKFvsIVVWA

    Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsIVVWA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.