IVVW ranks 3rd and PEPS 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
IVVW vs PEPS
PEPS −0.15pt a year
0.25%0.10%
IVVW 114.1×the volume
41.5K364
IVVW vs PEPS Performance
+13.4%+11.7%
- IVVW 0.25%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- IVVW $348M
- PEPS $29M
- IVVW +13.4%, better
- PEPS +11.7%
- IVVW 18.55%, better
- PEPS 0.97%
- IVVW 506
- PEPS 203
- IVVW 41.5K sh, better
- PEPS 364 sh
- IVVW $44.40
- PEPS $32.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVW | PEPS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C53Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | C53Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A72Higher | D39 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. IVVW and PEPS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVWA
PEPSB
In short
IVVW BlackRock's version of the covered call: hold the whole S&P 500 through the iShares Core fund, sell one-month index calls struck 1% out of the money, pay the premium out monthly. All for a quarter-point fee.
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
Stated mandate
IVVW The fund seeks to track an index strategy that holds the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and sells one-month call options primarily on the S&P 500 Index to generate income. The short option position is intended to be offset by the fund’s long position in the underlying ETF.
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVW vs PEPS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVW vs PEPS Cost
Overpaying IVVW vs PEPS
$3,053
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVW 0.25%
$5,159
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVW | PEPS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $183 | $272 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $717 | $1,052 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $2,106 | $3,053 |
- 0.25%IVVW
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW 2nd cheapest of 51 funds
IVVW vs PEPS Dividends
- IVVW 18.55%, better
- PEPS 0.97%
- IVVW $8.25
- PEPS $0.32
- IVVW $0.88
- PEPS $0.09
- IVVW Oct 2, 2026
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- IVVW Oct 7, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- IVVW Monthly
- PEPS Quarterly
Distribution history
IVVW vs PEPS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVW 7.3%PEPS 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVW 1.10PEPS 0.85
- Worst fall
- IVVW −16.8%PEPS −21.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVW 0.54PEPS 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.