IUSB ranks 2nd and HTAB 87th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
HTAB vs IUSB
IUSB −0.33pt a year
0.39%0.06%
IUSB 55.9×the volume
110K6.13M
HTAB +0.2pt
+0.4%+0.2%
HTAB vs IUSB Performance
+2.0%+0.9%
- HTAB 0.39%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- HTAB $224M
- IUSB $50.2B
- HTAB −0.7%
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- HTAB 3.93%
- IUSB 4.32%, better
- HTAB 171
- IUSB 18280
- HTAB 110K sh
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- HTAB $18.45
- IUSB $44.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HTAB | IUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A92Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D30 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. HTAB and IUSB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HTABC
IUSBA
In short
HTAB Most funds in the aggregate-bond aisle chase yield before taxes. HTAB chases what survives them: its stated goal is after-tax total return from investment-grade bonds, and it is measured against a municipal bond benchmark rather than a taxable aggregate one.
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
Stated mandate
HTAB The Fund seeks after-tax total return through a diversified portfolio of fixed-income debt instruments with varying maturities. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in U.S.-dollar-denominated, investment-grade fixed-income debt.
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HTAB vs IUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HTAB vs IUSB Cost
Overpaying HTAB vs IUSB
$6,628
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HTAB 0.39%
$7,898
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HTAB | IUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $110 | $595 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $432 | $2,293 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $1,270 | $6,628 |
- 0.39%HTAB
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
HTAB 67th cheapest of 114 funds
HTAB vs IUSB Dividends
- HTAB 3.93%
- IUSB 4.32%, better
- HTAB $0.73
- IUSB $1.94
- HTAB $0.06
- IUSB $0.15
- HTAB Oct 29, 2026
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- HTAB Pays Nov 2, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- HTAB Monthly
- IUSB Monthly
Distribution history
HTAB vs IUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HTAB
- IUSB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HTAB 7.5%IUSB 5.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HTAB 0.11IUSB 0.25, better
- Worst fall
- HTAB −14.1%, betterIUSB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HTAB 1.07IUSB 0.96
HTAB and IUSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
