XHS ranks 4th and HTEC 16th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
HTEC vs XHS
XHS −0.33pt a year
0.68%0.35%
HTEC 1.5×the volume
47.2K31.9K
XHS +6.8pt
−0.7%+6.1%
HTEC vs XHS Performance
−3.5%+34.4%
- HTEC 0.68%
- XHS 0.35%, better
- HTEC $113M
- XHS $234M
- HTEC +36.4%
- XHS +38.0%, better
- HTEC 0.76%, better
- XHS 0.15%
- HTEC 62
- XHS 63
- HTEC 47.2K sh, better
- XHS 31.9K sh
- HTEC $45.52
- XHS $144.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HTEC | XHS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | A84 | A87Higher |
| Durability | C47 | B64Higher |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. HTEC and XHS are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HTECC
XHSA
In short
HTEC Broad healthcare ETFs are mostly big pharma in a trench coat. HTEC goes the other way: roughly 60 global companies building the tools, from robotic surgery to gene sequencing to AI-assisted diagnostics.
XHS Most health care ETFs are pharma funds in disguise. XHS buys the delivery system instead: insurers, hospitals, distributors and clinics, roughly equal weighted so one giant insurer does not run the show.
Stated mandate
HTEC The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index before fees and expenses. It uses a primarily passive strategy and normally invests at least 80% of assets in Index or Healthcare Technology Company securities.
XHS The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index before fees and expenses, providing targeted exposure to health care services companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HTEC vs XHS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HTEC vs XHS Cost
Overpaying HTEC vs XHS
$6,126
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HTEC 0.68%
$13,252
XHS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HTEC | XHS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,215 | $634 | $581 |
| 20 | $4,633 | $2,454 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $13,252 | $7,126 | $6,126 |
- 0.68%HTEC
- 0.35%XHS, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
XHS 5th cheapest of 25 funds
HTEC 20th cheapest of 25 funds
HTEC vs XHS Dividends
- HTEC 0.76%, better
- XHS 0.15%
- HTEC $0.35
- XHS $0.21
- HTEC $0.35
- XHS $0.01
- HTEC Dec 30, 2025
- XHS Sep 21, 2026
- HTEC Dec 31, 2025
- XHS Sep 23, 2026
- HTEC Irregular
- XHS Quarterly
Distribution history
HTEC vs XHS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HTEC
- XHS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HTEC 18.8%, betterXHS 20.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- HTEC 1.14, betterXHS 0.85
- Worst fall
- HTEC −54.7%XHS −30.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- HTEC 1.23XHS 0.93
HTEC and XHS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.68% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
