FHLC ranks 2nd and HTEC 16th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FHLC vs HTEC
FHLC −0.60pt a year
0.08%0.68%
FHLC 5.2×the volume
246K47.2K
FHLC +7.8pt
+7.1%−0.7%
FHLC vs HTEC Performance
+41.1%−3.5%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- HTEC 0.68%
- FHLC $3.54B
- HTEC $113M
- FHLC +28.5%
- HTEC +36.4%, better
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- HTEC 0.76%
- FHLC 344
- HTEC 62
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- HTEC 47.2K sh
- FHLC $88.53
- HTEC $45.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHLC | HTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | C54 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | C47 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FHLC and HTEC are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHLCA
HTECC
In short
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
HTEC Broad healthcare ETFs are mostly big pharma in a trench coat. HTEC goes the other way: roughly 60 global companies building the tools, from robotic surgery to gene sequencing to AI-assisted diagnostics.
Stated mandate
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
HTEC The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index before fees and expenses. It uses a primarily passive strategy and normally invests at least 80% of assets in Index or Healthcare Technology Company securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHLC vs HTEC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHLC vs HTEC Cost
Overpaying HTEC vs FHLC
$11,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
HTEC 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHLC | HTEC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $1,215 | $1,061 |
| 20 | $603 | $4,633 | $4,030 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $13,252 | $11,479 |
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- 0.68%HTEC
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
HTEC 20th cheapest of 25 funds
FHLC vs HTEC Dividends
- FHLC 1.15%, better
- HTEC 0.76%
- FHLC $1.02
- HTEC $0.35
- FHLC $0.25
- HTEC $0.35
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- HTEC Dec 30, 2025
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- HTEC Dec 31, 2025
- FHLC Quarterly
- HTEC Irregular
Distribution history
FHLC vs HTEC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FHLC
- HTEC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHLC 14.5%, betterHTEC 18.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FHLC 0.83HTEC 1.14, better
- Worst fall
- FHLC −17.7%, betterHTEC −54.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FHLC 0.59HTEC 1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
