Skip to content
etf.net

HWO vs SFGV

Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund

HWODNasdaq

Sequoia Global Value ETF

SFGVANYSE Arca

Overlap

3.8%by weight

Expense ratio

SFGV −0.57pt a year

HWO0.90%SFGV0.33%

Avg volume · 30D

SFGV 52.1×the volume

HWO275SFGV14.3K

HWO vs SFGV Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.6%HWO+1.2%SFGV

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. HWO +5.6%. SFGV +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HWO 0.90%
SFGV 0.33%, better
Fund size
HWO $1M
SFGV $1.18B
1Y total return
HWO No data
SFGV +18.5%
Yield (12M)
HWO No data
SFGV 2.23%
Holdings
HWO 58
SFGV 517
Avg volume (30D)
HWO 275 sh
SFGV 14.3K sh, better
NAV per share
HWO $27.36
SFGV $36.02
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HWO: Cost 18, Risk 88, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 46, Durability 21. SFGV: Cost 93, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings 43, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for HWO, SFGV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHWOSFGV
Cost30% weightF18A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA88HigherA76
Tradability15% weightD29C53Higher
Holdings10% weightC46HigherC43
Durability5% weightF21A75Higher

Rank among Global Active Value funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HWO and SFGV are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Value⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

SFGV ranks 3rd and HWO 10th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVGVAvantis All Equity Markets Value ETF 9Score 77
  2. Rank 2AFEGEFirst Eagle Global Equity ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3ASFGVSequoia Global Value ETFScore 73
  4. Rank 4BFPAGFPA Global Equity ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 9COAKGOakmark Global Large Cap ETFScore 44
  6. Rank 10DHWOHotchkis & Wiley Opportunities FundScore 37
  7. Rank 11DWBIFWBI BullBear Value 3000 ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HWODHotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund

SFGVASequoia Global Value ETF

In short

HWO No data

SFGV A wealth manager's global value model in ETF clothing: SFGV hunts profitable companies with cheap cash flows and a habit of paying shareholders back, at 0.33% net of a waiver through March 31, 2027, below most global value rivals.

Stated mandate

HWO No data

SFGV The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.

Why people hold it

HWO No data

  • SFGV Value here means cash, not book value: the US sleeve starts with roughly the 3,000 largest American companies, then ranks them on shareholder yield and free cash flow yield.etfarchitect.com
  • 0.33% net of a waiver through March 31, 2027 (0.38% gross), below the category median and under peers like FEGE at 0.50% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026, and GKAT at 0.59%.
  • One ticket spans US, developed-international and emerging-market stocks across large, mid and small caps, held through individual names plus ETFs. Pays quarterly.etfarchitect.com
  • Trading since January 2024 and already a billion-dollar-plus fund, it sits in the upper tier of its global value peer group.

Worth knowing

HWO No data

  • SFGV It trades thinly, so spreads can be wider than on the big index names. That cost sits outside the expense ratio.
  • Part of the portfolio is held through other ETFs, whose own expenses stack on top of this fund's fee.etfarchitect.com
  • The name is younger than the fund: it traded as CCM Global Equity ETF until October 29, 2025, so part of the record predates the Sequoia label.etfarchitect.com

Full HWO profile⁠

Full SFGV profile⁠

HWO vs SFGV Holdings

How HWO and SFGV differ

Overlap by weight

3.8%

Shared holdings make up 37.1% of HWO and 3.9% of SFGV.

Level by level

  • Holdings19 in both3.8%
  • Sector11 Sectors66.1%
  • Countryby domicile74.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in HWO and SFGV, widest gap first
SectorMore in HWOMore in SFGV
TechnologyHWO +18.9 points
Consumer StaplesSFGV +7.9 points
Consumer DiscretionarySFGV +6.7 points
IndustrialsSFGV +6.0 points
FinancialsSFGV +5.4 points
CommunicationHWO +5.2 points
Real EstateSFGV +4.5 points
EnergyHWO +3.9 points
Health CareSFGV +3.5 points
MaterialsHWO +3.0 points
UtilitiesHWO +2.9 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HWO and SFGV, widest gap first
CountryMore in HWOMore in SFGV
United StatesHWO +18.5 points
SwedenHWO +4.5 points
TaiwanSFGV +3.2 points
CanadaSFGV +2.8 points
South KoreaSFGV +2.7 points
JapanSFGV +2.4 points
ChinaSFGV +2.2 points
SwitzerlandSFGV +1.8 points
Other countries (30)SFGV +8.1 points

Outside the US: SFGV 66% developed, 34% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HWO44.9%
  • SFGV46.4%

Securities held

  • HWO58
  • SFGV517

Asset class

HWO
Equity
SFGV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in HWO39
  • In both19
  • Only in SFGV498

Only in HWO

39 securities, 63.9% of HWO by weight

  • Workday Inc8.45%
  • Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson5.13%
  • Microsoft Corp4.71%

Only in SFGV

498 securities, 96.2% of SFGV by weight

  • Vanguard Ftse Developed Etf20.04%
  • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF5.96%
  • Avantis Real Estate ETF5.07%

Weight gaps

All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in HWO and SFGV, widest gap first
HoldingMore in HWOMore in SFGV
Aptiv PLCAPTVHWO +4.50 points
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031HWO +3.37 points
SLM CorpSLMHWO +3.29 points
APA CorpAPAHWO +3.08 points
California Resources CorpCRCHWO +2.72 points
Ovintiv IncOVVHWO +2.67 points
American International Group IncAIGHWO +2.37 points
Olin CorpOLNHWO +2.37 points

All HWO holdings⁠All SFGV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HWO vs SFGV Cost

Overpaying HWO vs SFGV

$10,303

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HWO 0.90%

    $17,040

  • SFGV 0.33%

    $6,737

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HWO 0.90%
  • SFGV 0.33%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HWO $17,040SFGV $6,737

Year by year

YearHWOSFGVOverpaying
10$1,593$598$995
20$6,015$2,318$3,697
30$17,040$6,737$10,303

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%HWO
  • 0.33%SFGV, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Active Value funds
  • Median 0.68%

SFGV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds

HWO 12th cheapest of 15 funds

HWO vs SFGV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HWO No data
SFGV 2.23%
Payout (12M)
HWO None
SFGV $0.80
Last payment
HWO No data
SFGV $0.14
Ex-dividend
HWO No data
SFGV Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
HWO No data
SFGV Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
HWO No data
SFGV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

HWOAll HWO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SFGVQuarterly · 11 paymentsAll SFGV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2024 $0.07; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $0.23; Mar 28, 2025 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.17; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.36; Mar 30, 2026 $0.09; Jun 29, 2026 $0.21; Sep 28, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

HWO vs SFGV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HWO No dataSFGV 10.6%since Feb 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HWO No dataSFGV 1.02since Feb 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HWO No dataSFGV −14.5%since Jan 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HWO 0.70SFGV 0.59

Popular comparisons

  • HWODvsAVGVA

    Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund · Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF 9

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SFGVAvsAVGVA

    Sequoia Global Value ETF · Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF 9

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HWODvsFEGEA

    Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund · First Eagle Global Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SFGVAvsFEGEA

    Sequoia Global Value ETF · First Eagle Global Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HWODvsFPAGB

    Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund · FPA Global Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SFGVAvsFPAGB

    Sequoia Global Value ETF · FPA Global Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.