HYGW ranks 3rd and SBAR 15th of 24 funds in the Other Index Option Income Category.
HYGW vs SBAR
HYGW −0.08pt a year
0.69%0.77%
SBAR 4.9×the volume
24.8K121K
HYGW vs SBAR Performance
+3.4%+7.2%
- HYGW 0.69%, better
- SBAR 0.77%
- HYGW $110M
- SBAR $440M
- HYGW +3.4%
- SBAR +7.2%, better
- HYGW 11.08%
- SBAR 12.40%, better
- HYGW 1328
- SBAR 8
- HYGW 24.8K sh
- SBAR 121K sh, better
- HYGW $28.13
- SBAR $24.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYGW | SBAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63Higher | F24 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A70Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A76Higher | A73 |
Rank among Other Index Option Income funds
Same Category. HYGW and SBAR are both graded against the same 24 Other Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYGWB
SBARC
In short
HYGW Covered calls, but on junk bonds instead of stocks. It holds iShares' high yield corporate bond ETF and writes monthly calls against it, stacking option premium on top of coupon income, paid out monthly.
SBAR Wall Street sells worst-of barrier notes to private clients. SBAR puts that trade in a ticker: it sells put options struck 30% below, measured on the weakest of three US equity baskets, and pays the premiums out monthly.
Stated mandate
HYGW The fund seeks exposure to the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
SBAR The fund seeks monthly income. Its adviser combines interest income with income-generating option spreads, primarily using a worst-of-three barrier put spread and adjusting other put-spread allocations as market conditions dictate.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYGW vs SBAR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYGW vs SBAR Cost
Overpaying SBAR vs HYGW
$1,400
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYGW 0.69%
$13,429
SBAR 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYGW | SBAR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,371 | $139 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,205 | $508 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $14,829 | $1,400 |
- 0.69%HYGW, cheaper
- 0.77%SBAR
- Middle half of Other Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.74%
HYGW 9th cheapest of 24 funds
SBAR 18th cheapest of 24 funds
HYGW vs SBAR Dividends
- HYGW 11.08%
- SBAR 12.40%, better
- HYGW $3.12
- SBAR $3.09
- HYGW $0.37
- SBAR $0.25
- HYGW Oct 2, 2026
- SBAR Oct 27, 2026
- HYGW Oct 7, 2026
- SBAR Oct 30, 2026
- HYGW Monthly
- SBAR Monthly
Distribution history
HYGW vs SBAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYGW 2.4%SBAR 6.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYGW 0.61SBAR 1.10
- Worst fall
- HYGW −5.5%SBAR −5.3%
- Market sensitivity
- HYGW 0.30SBAR 0.40
HYGW and SBAR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

