HYLB ranks 2nd and XCCC 47th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYLB vs XCCC
HYLB −0.35pt a year
0.05%0.40%
HYLB 4.7×the volume
1.29M276K
HYLB +0.7pt
+7.6%+6.9%
HYLB vs XCCC Performance
+2.7%−5.2%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- XCCC 0.40%
- HYLB $3.29B
- XCCC $200M
- HYLB +2.7%, better
- XCCC −5.2%
- HYLB 6.73%
- XCCC 11.33%, better
- HYLB 1285
- XCCC 178
- HYLB 1.29M sh, better
- XCCC 276K sh
- HYLB $35.09
- XCCC $32.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYLB | XCCC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | B58 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A84 |
| Risk | C54Higher | F9 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A77Higher | C53 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYLB and XCCC are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYLBA
XCCCB
In short
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
XCCC Most junk bond funds bury CCC credits inside a blend of BB and B. XCCC isolates them: a single-rung fund holding the lowest tier of the high yield market, the last stop before default.
Stated mandate
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
XCCC The fund seeks total return by primarily investing, through other ETFs, in U.S.-dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds across sectors of the fixed-income market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYLB vs XCCC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYLB vs XCCC Cost
Overpaying XCCC vs HYLB
$7,030
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
XCCC 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYLB | XCCC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $723 | $631 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,793 | $2,433 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $8,090 | $7,030 |
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- 0.40%XCCC
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
XCCC 37th cheapest of 84 funds
HYLB vs XCCC Dividends
- HYLB 6.73%
- XCCC 11.33%, better
- HYLB $2.37
- XCCC $3.70
- HYLB $0.19
- XCCC $0.35
- HYLB Nov 2, 2026
- XCCC Nov 2, 2026
- HYLB Pays Nov 9, 2026
- XCCC Nov 5, 2026
- HYLB Monthly
- XCCC Monthly
Distribution history
HYLB vs XCCC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYLB 4.8%, betterXCCC 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYLB 0.82, betterXCCC 0.46
- Worst fall
- HYLB −15.5%XCCC −11.0%
- Market sensitivity
- HYLB 0.66XCCC 0.69
HYLB and XCCC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
