SCYB ranks 1st and HYLB 3rd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYLB vs SCYB
SCYB −0.02pt a year
0.05%0.03%
HYLB 1.1×the volume
1.22M1.1M
HYLB +0.1pt
+8.5%+8.4%
HYLB vs SCYB Performance
+1.9%+2.0%
- HYLB 0.05%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYLB $3.3B
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYLB +1.9%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYLB 1280
- SCYB 1844
- HYLB 1.22M sh, better
- SCYB 1.1M sh
- HYLB $35.23
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYLB | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B59 | B59 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A88 |
| Holdings | A88 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYLB and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYLBA
SCYBA
In short
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYLB vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYLB vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYLB vs SCYB
$422
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYLB | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $55 | $37 |
| 20 | $360 | $216 | $144 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $638 | $422 |
- 0.05%HYLB
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
HYLB vs SCYB Dividends
- HYLB 6.73%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYLB $2.37
- SCYB $1.80
- HYLB $0.20
- SCYB $0.16
- HYLB Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYLB Oct 8, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYLB Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYLB vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYLB 4.8%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HYLB 0.82SCYB 0.82Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- HYLB −15.5%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYLB 0.66SCYB 0.28
HYLB and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
