Skip to content

IAUG vs IOCT

Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IAUGBNYSE Arca

Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IOCTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

IAUG0.85%IOCT0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

IAUG 1.2×the volume

IAUG25.8KIOCT22K

IAUG vs IOCT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.0%IAUG+10.1%IOCT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. IAUG +8.0%. IOCT +10.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IAUG 0.85%
IOCT 0.85%
Fund size
IAUG $80M
IOCT $200M
1Y total return
IAUG +8.0%
IOCT +10.1%, better
Holdings
IAUG 3
IOCT 3
Avg volume (30D)
IAUG 25.8K sh, better
IOCT 22K sh
NAV per share
IAUG $30.19
IOCT $37.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IAUG: Cost 38, Risk 78, Mission 96, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 63. IOCT: Cost 38, Risk 59, Mission 72, Tradability 80, Holdings not scored, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for IAUG, IOCT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIAUGIOCT
Cost30% weightD38D38
Mission25% weightA96HigherA72
Risk15% weightA78HigherB59
Tradability15% weightA76A80Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB63A82Higher

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IAUG and IOCT are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 26 ›

IAUG ranks 3rd and IOCT 4th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 4BIJULInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4BIOCTInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 4BJULIAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IAUGBInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IOCTBInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

In short

IAUG Downside padding for foreign stocks instead of the usual S&P 500 target. IAUG shadows the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, absorbs the first 15% of a year's losses, and trades away upside above a cap reset every August 1.

IOCT Padding for the non-US sleeve. IOCT tracks the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, absorbs the first 15% of losses over each 12-month outcome period, and gives up gains above a cap in exchange. The clock resets every October 1.

Stated mandate

IAUG The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a predetermined upside cap while protecting against the first 15% of underlying ETF losses during the outcome period.

IOCT The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • IAUG The deal is written down in advance: match the reference ETF's return up to a preset cap, with the first 15% of its losses absorbed over an outcome period running August 1 to July 31.innovatoretfs.com
  • One rung in a 12-month ladder on the same EAFE exposure (IJUL, ISEP, IOCT and the rest), so entry points can be staggered rather than pinned to a single reset date.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.85% a year, it charges the same as the median fund in its buffered-international peer group. No premium for the international twist.
  • IOCT The deal is written into the fund's own terms: the first 15 percentage points of the reference ETF's losses are absorbed over the outcome period, with upside capped at a level set at each reset.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference asset is the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, so the buffer sits on developed international stocks rather than the S&P 500 that most defined-outcome funds target.innovatoretfs.com
  • Part of a monthly series (IJUL, IMAY, IMAR, IAPR and more) running the same 15% structure on staggered start months, so entry points are not limited to one date a year.
  • Priced at 0.85%, the same as the median international buffer fund, and it grades in the upper half of a 17-fund peer group.

Worth knowing

  • IAUG Thinly traded with a small asset base, which usually means wider bid-ask spreads than the big buffer funds carry.
  • The 15% buffer and the cap are engineered for investors who hold the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and your actual cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • An options-built structure aimed at price outcomes, not cash flow. Distributions have not been part of the picture.
  • IOCT The 15% buffer and the cap are designed to work over a full outcome period. Buy partway through and you inherit whatever buffer and upside are left, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Volume is light compared with mainstream international funds, which can mean wider spreads on the way in and out.
  • This is an options package, not an income vehicle: it has not paid distributions over the past year, so any result shows up in the share price.

Full IAUG profile⁠

Full IOCT profile⁠

IAUG vs IOCT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IAUG vs IOCT Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IAUG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • IOCT 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IAUG 0.85%
  • IOCT 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530IAUG $16,199IOCT $16,199

Year by year

YearIAUGIOCT
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%IAUG
  • 0.85%IOCT
  • Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.85%

IAUG 11th cheapest of 26 funds

IOCT 11th cheapest of 26 funds

IAUG vs IOCT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
IAUG None
IOCT None

Distribution history

IAUGAll IAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IOCTAll IOCT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IAUG vs IOCT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IAUG 6.3%since Sep 2024IOCT 6.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IAUG 0.63since Sep 2024IOCT 1.29
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IAUG −8.0%since Aug 2024IOCT −16.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IAUG 0.25IOCT 0.35

Popular comparisons

  • IAUGBvsBUFIB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IOCTBvsBUFIB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IAUGBvsQBIFB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IOCTBvsQBIFB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IAUGBvsIJULB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IOCTBvsIJULB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.