QBIF ranks 2nd and IOCT 4th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IOCT vs QBIF
QBIF −0.11pt a year
0.85%0.74%
IOCT 7.6×the volume
22K2.9K
IOCT vs QBIF Performance
+0.4%−1.2%
- IOCT 0.85%
- QBIF 0.74%, better
- IOCT $200M
- QBIF $9M
- IOCT +10.1%
- QBIF
- IOCT 3
- QBIF 3
- IOCT 22K sh, better
- QBIF 2.9K sh
- IOCT $37.74
- QBIF $26.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IOCT | QBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A72 | |
| Risk | B59 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | D26 |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IOCT and QBIF are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IOCTB
QBIFB
In short
IOCT Padding for the non-US sleeve. IOCT tracks the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, absorbs the first 15% of losses over each 12-month outcome period, and gives up gains above a cap in exchange. The clock resets every October 1.
Stated mandate
IOCT The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IOCT vs QBIF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IOCT vs QBIF Cost
Overpaying IOCT vs QBIF
$1,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IOCT 0.85%
$16,199
QBIF 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IOCT | QBIF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,319 | $189 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,015 | $691 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,307 | $1,892 |
- 0.85%IOCT
- 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds
IOCT 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IOCT vs QBIF Dividends
- IOCT None
- QBIF None
Distribution history
IOCT vs QBIF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IOCT 6.7%QBIF
- Return per unit of risk
- IOCT 1.29QBIF
- Worst fall
- IOCT −16.9%QBIF
- Market sensitivity
- IOCT 0.35QBIF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.