Skip to content

IAUG vs YJUN

Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

IAUGBNYSE Arca

FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

YJUNDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

IAUG −0.05pt a year

IAUG0.85%YJUN0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

IAUG 1.1×the volume

IAUG25.8KYJUN23.9K

IAUG vs YJUN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.0%IAUG+6.8%YJUN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. IAUG +8.0%. YJUN +6.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IAUG 0.85%, better
YJUN 0.90%
Fund size
IAUG $80M
YJUN $152M
1Y total return
IAUG +8.0%, better
YJUN +6.8%
Holdings
IAUG 3
YJUN 3
Avg volume (30D)
IAUG 25.8K sh, better
YJUN 23.9K sh
NAV per share
IAUG $30.19
YJUN $26.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IAUG: Cost 38, Risk 78, Mission 96, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 63. YJUN: Cost 6, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 69, Durability 80.
Pillar letters and Scores for IAUG, YJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIAUGYJUN
Cost30% weightD38HigherF6
Mission25% weightA96Not scored
Risk15% weightA78HigherB61
Tradability15% weightA76HigherB64
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB69
Durability5% weightB63A80Higher

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IAUG and YJUN are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 26 ›

IAUG ranks 3rd and YJUN 24th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 4BIJULInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 20CIDMYCorgi International Developed Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 24DYJUNFT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 37
  7. Rank 25DYSEPFT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IAUGBInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

YJUNDFT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

In short

IAUG Downside padding for foreign stocks instead of the usual S&P 500 target. IAUG shadows the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, absorbs the first 15% of a year's losses, and trades away upside above a cap reset every August 1.

YJUN Buffers are mostly an S&P 500 game. YJUN plays it overseas: FLEX options on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, a 15% cushion against losses, and an upside cap that resets every June.

Stated mandate

IAUG The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a predetermined upside cap while protecting against the first 15% of underlying ETF losses during the outcome period.

YJUN Seeks to match the price return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF up to a 14.65% cap while protecting the first 15% of losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 target outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • IAUG The deal is written down in advance: match the reference ETF's return up to a preset cap, with the first 15% of its losses absorbed over an outcome period running August 1 to July 31.innovatoretfs.com
  • One rung in a 12-month ladder on the same EAFE exposure (IJUL, ISEP, IOCT and the rest), so entry points can be staggered rather than pinned to a single reset date.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.85% a year, it charges the same as the median fund in its buffered-international peer group. No premium for the international twist.
  • YJUN The 15% buffer is written into the fund's design, resetting each June for a fresh 12-month outcome period against EAFE's price move.ftportfolios.com
  • Defined-outcome shelves lean heavily toward US large cap. This one puts the same buffer machinery on developed markets outside America.ftportfolios.com
  • It sits in a March/June/September/December lineup (YMAR, YSEP, YDEC), so investors can pick a start month or spread money across periods.ftportfolios.com

Worth knowing

  • IAUG Thinly traded with a small asset base, which usually means wider bid-ask spreads than the big buffer funds carry.
  • The 15% buffer and the cap are engineered for investors who hold the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and your actual cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • An options-built structure aimed at price outcomes, not cash flow. Distributions have not been part of the picture.
  • YJUN The buffer counts from the period's start. Buy partway in and your actual cushion and remaining upside differ from the headline terms.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.90% a year, above the 0.85% charged by the Innovator international buffer funds (IJUL, IMAR, ISEP) built on the same EAFE exposure.
  • It follows EAFE's price return, so foreign dividends stay outside the payoff. Cap and buffer are also measured before fees and expenses.ftportfolios.com

Full IAUG profile⁠

Full YJUN profile⁠

IAUG vs YJUN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IAUG vs YJUN Cost

Overpaying YJUN vs IAUG

$841

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IAUG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • YJUN 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IAUG 0.85%
  • YJUN 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530YJUN $17,040IAUG $16,199

Year by year

YearIAUGYJUNOverpaying
10$1,508$1,593$85
20$5,706$6,015$309
30$16,199$17,040$841

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%IAUG, cheaper
  • 0.90%YJUN
  • Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.85%

IAUG 11th cheapest of 26 funds

YJUN 23rd cheapest of 26 funds

IAUG vs YJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
IAUG None
YJUN None

Distribution history

IAUGAll IAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

YJUNAll YJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IAUG vs YJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IAUG 6.3%since Sep 2024YJUN 7.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IAUG 0.63since Sep 2024YJUN 0.88
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IAUG −8.0%since Aug 2024YJUN −21.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IAUG 0.25YJUN 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • IAUGBvsBUFIB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YJUNDvsBUFIB

    FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IAUGBvsQBIFB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YJUNDvsQBIFB

    FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IAUGBvsIJULB

    Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YJUNDvsIJULB

    FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.