Skip to content
etf.net

QBIF vs YJUN

AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

QBIFBCboe

FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

YJUNDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QBIF −0.16pt a year

QBIF0.74%YJUN0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

YJUN 8.2×the volume

QBIF2.9KYJUN23.9K

QBIF vs YJUN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.2%QBIF−1.2%YJUN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QBIF −1.2%. YJUN −1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−0.5%0%0.5%1%1.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QBIF 0.74%, better
YJUN 0.90%
Fund size
QBIF $9M
YJUN $152M
1Y total return
QBIF No data
YJUN +6.8%
Holdings
QBIF 3
YJUN 3
Avg volume (30D)
QBIF 2.9K sh
YJUN 23.9K sh, better
NAV per share
QBIF $26.00
YJUN $26.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBIF: Cost 78, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 55, Durability 26. YJUN: Cost 6, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 69, Durability 80.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBIF, YJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBIFYJUN
Cost30% weightA78HigherF6
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherB61
Tradability15% weightD35B64Higher
Holdings10% weightB55B69Higher
Durability5% weightD26A80Higher

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBIF and YJUN are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Developed International Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 26 funds
See all 26 ›

QBIF ranks 2nd and YJUN 24th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 20CIDMYCorgi International Developed Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 24DYJUNFT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 37
  6. Rank 25DYSEPFT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QBIFBAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

YJUNDFT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

In short

QBIF No data

YJUN Buffers are mostly an S&P 500 game. YJUN plays it overseas: FLEX options on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, a 15% cushion against losses, and an upside cap that resets every June.

Stated mandate

QBIF No data

YJUN Seeks to match the price return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF up to a 14.65% cap while protecting the first 15% of losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 target outcome period.

Why people hold it

QBIF No data

  • YJUN The 15% buffer is written into the fund's design, resetting each June for a fresh 12-month outcome period against EAFE's price move.ftportfolios.com
  • Defined-outcome shelves lean heavily toward US large cap. This one puts the same buffer machinery on developed markets outside America.ftportfolios.com
  • It sits in a March/June/September/December lineup (YMAR, YSEP, YDEC), so investors can pick a start month or spread money across periods.ftportfolios.com

Worth knowing

QBIF No data

  • YJUN The buffer counts from the period's start. Buy partway in and your actual cushion and remaining upside differ from the headline terms.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.90% a year, above the 0.85% charged by the Innovator international buffer funds (IJUL, IMAR, ISEP) built on the same EAFE exposure.
  • It follows EAFE's price return, so foreign dividends stay outside the payoff. Cap and buffer are also measured before fees and expenses.ftportfolios.com

Full QBIF profile⁠

Full YJUN profile⁠

QBIF vs YJUN Holdings

How QBIF and YJUN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QBIF and 0.0% of YJUN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors96.4%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in QBIF and YJUN, widest gap first
SectorMore in QBIFMore in YJUN
FinancialsYJUN +3.6 points
IndustrialsQBIF +0.9 points
TechnologyQBIF +0.6 points
Health CareQBIF +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQBIF +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesQBIF +0.3 points
MaterialsQBIF +0.3 points
CommunicationQBIF +0.2 points
EnergyQBIF +0.2 points
UtilitiesQBIF +0.2 points
Real EstateQBIF +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QBIF and YJUN, widest gap first
CountryMore in QBIFMore in YJUN
JapanSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
GermanySame weight
FranceSame weight
AustraliaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
SpainSame weight
Other countries (17)Same weight

Outside the US: QBIF 99% developed, 1% emerging. YJUN 99% developed, 1% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QBIF101.7%
  • YJUN102.2%

Securities held

  • QBIF2
  • YJUN2

Asset class

QBIF
Equity
YJUN
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in QBIF2
  • In both0
  • Only in YJUN2

Only in QBIF

2 securities, 100% of QBIF by weight

  • Efa 12/31/2026 0.78 C98.87%
  • Efa 12/31/2026 103.88 P2.30%

Only in YJUN

2 securities, 100% of YJUN by weight

  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI EAFE ETF C 1.0496.22%
  • 2027-06-17 iShares MSCI EAFE ETF P 104.415.01%

Weight gaps

QBIF and YJUN share no securities.

All 5 QBIF holdings⁠All 4 YJUN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBIF vs YJUN Cost

Overpaying YJUN vs QBIF

$2,733

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBIF 0.74%

    $14,307

  • YJUN 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBIF 0.74%
  • YJUN 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530YJUN $17,040QBIF $14,307

Year by year

YearQBIFYJUNOverpaying
10$1,319$1,593$274
20$5,015$6,015$1,000
30$14,307$17,040$2,733

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
  • 0.90%YJUN
  • Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.85%

QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds

YJUN 23rd cheapest of 26 funds

QBIF vs YJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QBIF None
YJUN None

Distribution history

QBIFAll QBIF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

YJUNAll YJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBIF vs YJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QBIF No dataYJUN 7.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QBIF No dataYJUN 0.88
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QBIF No dataYJUN −21.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBIF 0.03YJUN 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • QBIFBvsBUFIB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • YJUNDvsBUFIB

    FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBIFBvsIAUGB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • YJUNDvsIAUGB

    FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBIFBvsIJULB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • YJUNDvsIJULB

    FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.