IBB ranks 3rd and WDNA 11th of 17 funds in the Biotech & Genomics Category.
IBB vs WDNA
IBB −0.01pt a year
0.44%0.45%
IBB 638.7×the volume
1.65M2.58K
IBB +6.6pt
+6.7%+0.1%
IBB vs WDNA Performance
+38.1%+0.4%
- IBB 0.44%, better
- WDNA 0.45%
- IBB $11.5B
- WDNA $5M
- IBB +36.8%
- WDNA +46.6%, better
- IBB 0.16%
- WDNA 3.21%, better
- IBB 243
- WDNA 89
- IBB 1.65M sh, better
- WDNA 2.58K sh
- IBB $217.59
- WDNA $24.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBB | WDNA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69Higher | B56 |
| Mission | A83Higher | B65 |
| Risk | B69Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | F3 |
| Holdings | C45 | A80Higher |
| Durability | A89Higher | F20 |
Rank among Biotech & Genomics funds
Same Category. IBB and WDNA are both graded against the same 17 Biotech & Genomics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBBA
WDNAC
In short
IBB Biotech's original index fund. Since 2001 IBB has packed the whole US biotech sector, roughly 250 names, into one line item for 0.44% a year, below what the typical biotech fund charges.
WDNA Most biotech funds stop at drug developers. WDNA follows biology out of the clinic and into food, materials and industrial chemistry, tracking a WisdomTree index shaped with futurist Jamie Metzl.
Stated mandate
IBB The Fund seeks to track an index composed of U.S.-listed equities focused on the biotechnology sector.
WDNA The Fund seeks to track the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive representative-sampling approach to gain global equity exposure to companies expected to be significantly transformed by advances in genetics and biotechnology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBB vs WDNA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBB vs WDNA Cost
Overpaying WDNA vs IBB
$189
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBB 0.44%
$8,852
WDNA 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBB | WDNA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $794 | $812 | $18 |
| 20 | $3,061 | $3,128 | $67 |
| 30 | $8,852 | $9,041 | $189 |
- 0.44%IBB, cheaper
- 0.45%WDNA
- Middle half of Biotech & Genomics funds
- Median 0.47%
IBB 6th cheapest of 17 funds
WDNA 7th cheapest of 17 funds
IBB vs WDNA Dividends
- IBB 0.16%
- WDNA 3.21%, better
- IBB $0.34
- WDNA $0.77
- IBB $0.01
- WDNA $0.77
- IBB Sep 15, 2026
- WDNA Dec 26, 2025
- IBB Sep 18, 2026
- WDNA Dec 30, 2025
- IBB Quarterly
- WDNA Annual
Distribution history
IBB vs WDNA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IBB
- WDNA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBB 17.9%, betterWDNA 24.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBB 1.07, betterWDNA 0.79
- Worst fall
- IBB −35.7%, betterWDNA −56.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBB 0.70WDNA 1.26
IBB and WDNA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.44% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


