IBBQ ranks 2nd and WDNA 11th of 17 funds in the Biotech & Genomics Category.
IBBQ vs WDNA
IBBQ −0.26pt a year
0.19%0.45%
IBBQ 14.2×the volume
36.6K2.58K
IBBQ +8.6pt
+8.7%+0.1%
IBBQ vs WDNA Performance
+51.6%+0.4%
- IBBQ 0.19%, better
- WDNA 0.45%
- IBBQ $120M
- WDNA $5M
- IBBQ +37.1%
- WDNA +46.6%, better
- IBBQ 1.08%
- WDNA 3.21%, better
- IBBQ 250
- WDNA 89
- IBBQ 36.6K sh, better
- WDNA 2.58K sh
- IBBQ $36.17
- WDNA $24.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBBQ | WDNA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B56 |
| Mission | A84Higher | B65 |
| Risk | A73Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | C48Higher | F3 |
| Holdings | B62 | A80Higher |
| Durability | C42Higher | F20 |
Rank among Biotech & Genomics funds
Same Category. IBBQ and WDNA are both graded against the same 17 Biotech & Genomics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBBQA
WDNAC
In short
IBBQ The broad Nasdaq biotech benchmark, bought cheap. IBBQ tracks the whole listed biotech and pharma field, roughly 300 names, for 0.19% a year, well under half the typical fee in its category.
WDNA Most biotech funds stop at drug developers. WDNA follows biology out of the clinic and into food, materials and industrial chemistry, tracking a WisdomTree index shaped with futurist Jamie Metzl.
Stated mandate
IBBQ The Fund tracks the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index and normally invests at least 90% of its assets in index constituents. The index covers Nasdaq-listed companies classified as biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies.
WDNA The Fund seeks to track the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive representative-sampling approach to gain global equity exposure to companies expected to be significantly transformed by advances in genetics and biotechnology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBBQ vs WDNA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBBQ vs WDNA Cost
Overpaying WDNA vs IBBQ
$5,089
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBBQ 0.19%
$3,952
WDNA 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBBQ | WDNA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $812 | $465 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,128 | $1,777 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $9,041 | $5,089 |
- 0.19%IBBQ, cheaper
- 0.45%WDNA
- Middle half of Biotech & Genomics funds
- Median 0.47%
IBBQ cheapest of 17 funds
WDNA 7th cheapest of 17 funds
IBBQ vs WDNA Dividends
- IBBQ 1.08%
- WDNA 3.21%, better
- IBBQ $0.39
- WDNA $0.77
- IBBQ $0.23
- WDNA $0.77
- IBBQ Sep 21, 2026
- WDNA Dec 26, 2025
- IBBQ Sep 25, 2026
- WDNA Dec 30, 2025
- IBBQ Quarterly
- WDNA Annual
Distribution history
IBBQ vs WDNA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IBBQ
- WDNA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBBQ 16.8%, betterWDNA 24.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBBQ 1.22, betterWDNA 0.79
- Worst fall
- IBBQ −34.8%, betterWDNA −56.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBBQ 0.61WDNA 1.26
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.