SCHP ranks 1st and IBIK 15th of 40 funds in the TIPS Category.
IBIK vs SCHP
SCHP −0.07pt a year
0.10%0.03%
SCHP 234.3×the volume
24.9K5.83M
IBIK vs SCHP Performance
−0.6%−0.2%
- IBIK 0.10%
- SCHP 0.03%, better
- IBIK $101M
- SCHP $17.6B
- IBIK −0.6%
- SCHP −0.2%, better
- IBIK 5.22%, better
- SCHP 4.88%
- IBIK 4
- SCHP 49
- IBIK 24.9K sh
- SCHP 5.83M sh, better
- IBIK $24.60
- SCHP $25.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBIK | SCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C47Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | D37 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | A80Higher |
| Durability | C48 | A82Higher |
Rank among TIPS funds
Same Category. IBIK and SCHP are both graded against the same 40 TIPS funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBIKB
SCHPA
In short
IBIK A ladder rung built from inflation-linked Treasuries. IBIK tracks TIPS maturing in 2034 and winds down at term, bringing the defined-maturity treatment to the inflation-protected corner of the Treasury market.
SCHP Inflation insurance in the plainest wrapper available: SCHP owns the full maturity range of Treasury inflation-protected bonds and tracks its Bloomberg index for three basis points a year.
Stated mandate
IBIK The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities maturing in 2034. It is designed to provide inflation protection, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
SCHP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index composed of inflation-protected U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBIK vs SCHP Holdings
How IBIK and SCHP differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
IBIK and SCHP share no Sector name, so they cannot be compared by Sector.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IBIKMore in SCHP | Gap | IBIK | SCHP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- IBIK100.0%
- SCHP36.0%
- IBIK2
- SCHP49
Asset class
- IBIK
- Bonds
- SCHP
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. IBIK holds 2 securities, SCHP 49.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBIK vs SCHP Cost
Overpaying IBIK vs SCHP
$1,468
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBIK 0.10%
$2,106
SCHP 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBIK | SCHP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $55 | $128 |
| 20 | $717 | $216 | $501 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $638 | $1,468 |
- 0.10%IBIK
- 0.03%SCHP, cheaper
- Middle half of TIPS funds
- Median 0.10%
SCHP cheapest of 40 funds
IBIK 7th cheapest of 40 funds
IBIK vs SCHP Dividends
- IBIK 5.22%, better
- SCHP 4.88%
- IBIK $1.28
- SCHP $1.25
- IBIK $0.18
- SCHP $0.08
- IBIK Oct 1, 2026
- SCHP Nov 2, 2026
- IBIK Oct 6, 2026
- SCHP Nov 6, 2026
- IBIK Quarterly
- SCHP Monthly
Distribution history
IBIK vs SCHP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBIK 5.4%SCHP 4.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBIK −0.01SCHP 0.09
- Worst fall
- IBIK −5.6%SCHP −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IBIK 0.15SCHP 0.70
IBIK and SCHP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

