IBMP ranks 1st and IBMR 3rd of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMP vs IBMR
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.10%0.10%
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
105K105K
IBMR +0.8pt
+3.7%+4.5%
IBMP vs IBMR Performance
+2.4%+1.6%
- IBMP 0.10%
- IBMR 0.10%
- IBMP $685M
- IBMR $527M
- IBMP +2.4%, better
- IBMR +1.6%
- IBMP 2.53%
- IBMR 2.54%, better
- IBMP 1859
- IBMR 2071
- IBMP 105K sh
- IBMR 105K sh
- IBMP $25.35
- IBMR $25.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMP | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A87 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B66Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | A83 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | A89 |
| Durability | A94Higher | A85 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMP and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMPA
IBMRA
In short
IBMP A single rung of a muni ladder in one ticker: investment-grade bonds that all mature in 2027, tax-exempt income paid monthly along the way, and a defined end date instead of a fund that rolls on forever.
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
IBMP The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2027. It is designed to provide tax-exempt income, support bond-ladder construction, and manage interest-rate risk through a defined maturity.
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMP vs IBMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMP vs IBMR Cost
Same expense ratio
$2,106
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMP 0.10%
$2,106
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMP | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $183 |
| 20 | $717 | $717 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $2,106 |
- 0.10%IBMP
- 0.10%IBMR
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMP cheapest of 32 funds
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
IBMP vs IBMR Dividends
- IBMP 2.53%
- IBMR 2.54%, better
- IBMP $0.64
- IBMR $0.64
- IBMP $0.06
- IBMR $0.05
- IBMP Oct 1, 2026
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- IBMP Oct 6, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- IBMP Monthly
- IBMR Monthly
Distribution history
IBMP vs IBMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMP 2.3%, betterIBMR 4.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMP −0.33IBMR 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- IBMP −9.4%IBMR −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMP 0.40IBMR 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.